Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 11;34(2):e23061. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23061

Table 4.

Cox's regression model analysis of factors effecting DFS

Items Univariate Cox's regression Multivariate Cox's regression
P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI
Lower Higher Lower Higher
AKIP1 expression (high vs low) <.001 1.663 1.288 2.147 .001 1.569 1.210 2.035
Age (>60 y vs ≤60 y) .191 1.178 0.922 1.506 .110 1.235 0.953 1.599
Gender (male vs female) .896 0.979 0.712 1.346 .988 1.003 0.719 1.397
Tumor size (>5 cm vs ≤5 cm) .099 1.231 0.962 1.575 .102 0.740 0.516 1.061
Lymph node metastasis (yes vs no) <.001 1.752 1.357 2.262 <.001 2.050 1.397 3.007
TNM stage (III vs II/I) .004 1.462 1.133 1.888 .899 1.027 0.681 1.548
Pathological differentiation (poor vs moderate/well) .001 1.611 1.211 2.142 <.001 1.732 1.281 2.341

Factors effecting DFS were determined by univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazards regression model analyses. P value < .05 was considered significant.

Abbreviations: AKIP1, A‐kinase‐interacting protein 1; DFS, disease‐free survival; TNM, tumor node metastasis.