Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 11;34(2):e23061. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23061

Table 5.

Cox's regression model analysis of factors effecting OS

Items Univariate Cox's regression Multivariate Cox's regression
P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI
Lower Higher Lower Higher
AKIP1 expression (high vs low) <.001 1.933 1.435 2.604 <.001 1.830 1.353 2.476
Age (>60 y vs ≤60 y) .637 1.068 0.813 1.402 .781 1.042 0.779 1.395
Gender (male vs female) .682 0.930 0.657 1.317 .796 0.954 0.665 1.367
Tumor size (>5 cm vs ≤5 cm) .002 1.521 1.160 1.994 .865 0.969 0.673 1.394
Lymph node metastasis (yes vs no) <.001 2.300 1.744 3.034 <.001 2.873 1.941 4.253
TNM stage (III vs II/I) .002 1.557 1.172 2.069 .156 0.736 0.481 1.125
Pathological differentiation (poor vs moderate/well) .016 1.469 1.075 2.007 .009 1.571 1.121 2.202

Factors effecting OS were determined by univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazards regression model analyses. P value < .05 was considered significant.

Abbreviations: AKIP1, A‐kinase‐interacting protein 1; OS, overall survival; TNM, tumor node metastasis.