Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 27;12(1):3–15. doi: 10.1111/os.12572

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients in the trials included in the meta‐analysis

Study Country Publication year Study design BMI (kg/m2) No. of patients type of surgical procedure Male/female Age (mean ± SD, year) NOS score
Kalanithi et al.5 USA 2012 Retrospective cross‐sectional study <25.0 83,152 ACDF/posterior cervical fusion NA NA 7
≥40 1455 ACDF/posterior cervical fusion NA NA
Sielatycki et al.14 USA 2016 Prospective cohort <35 219 ACDF 124/95 52.8 ± 10.3 7
≥35 80 ACDF 36/44 51.3 ± 9.2
Buerba et al.22 USA 2014 Retrospective cohort 18.5–29.9 2072 ACDF 1024/1003 NA 7
30–34.9 915 ACDF 508/407 NA
35–39.9 419 ACDF 180/239 NA
≥40 265 ACDF 97/168 NA
Narain et al.23 USA 2018 Retrospective cohort <25.0 58 ACDF 29/29 49.5 ± 11.3 7
25.0–29.9 104 ACDF 60/44 48.8 ± 9.2
30.0–34.9 69 ACDF 44/25 51.8 ± 11.2
≥35.0 46 ACDF 22/24 53.4 ± 11.2
Phan et al.24 USA 2017 Retrospective cohort ≤30 322 Posterior cervical fusion 184/138 NA 7
>30 202 Posterior cervical fusion 103/99 NA
Wilson et al.25 USA 2017 Retrospective cohort <18.5 17 ACDF NA NA 6
18.5–24.99 271 ACDF NA NA
25–29.99 275 ACDF NA NA
>30 194 ACDF NA NA
Sami Walid et al.26 USA 2010 Retrospective cohort <30 318 ACDF NA NA 6
≥30 287 ACDF NA NA

ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; BMI, body mass index; NA, not available; SD, standard deviation.