Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 19;10(1):2045894019850993. doi: 10.1177/2045894019850993

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

RV SV has a significant effect on the precision of RV diastolic stiffness coefficient (β). (a) There were no significant differences between the CMR-derived SV and the RHC-derived SV. (b) In a Bland–Altman analysis, there were large limits of agreement between estimates of SV. (c) Similarly, there were no significant differences in the derived diastolic stiffness coefficient (β) when CMR-derived and RHC-derived SVs were used. (d) There was a decrease in the precision of the diastolic stiffness coefficient (β) due to the different SVs.