Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 27;13(5):459–471. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2017.12.006

Table 3.

Full factorial design and experimental responses for each design point.

Run X1 X2 X3 X4 Fiber diameter (Y1) [nm] Bead amount (Y2)
1 −1 −1 −1 −1 297 0.76
2 +1 −1 −1 −1 554 0.05
3 −1 +1 −1 −1 378 1.04
4 +1 +1 −1 −1 741 0.02
5 −1 −1 +1 −1 309 0.80
6 +1 −1 +1 −1 774 0.03
7 −1 +1 +1 −1 448 1.04
8 +1 +1 +1 −1 695 0.02
9 −1 −1 −1 +1 315 1.20
10 +1 −1 −1 +1 714 0.16
11 −1 +1 −1 +1 549 0.43
12 +1 +1 −1 +1 830 0.03
13 −1 −1 +1 +1 357 0.96
14 +1 −1 +1 +1 783 0.03
15 −1 +1 +1 +1 544 0.42
16 +1 +1 +1 +1 888 0.03
17 0 0 0 0 394 0.75
18 0 0 0 0 411 0.65
19 0 0 0 0 335 0.78