Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 20.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2020 Jan 14;30(2):335–350.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.033

Table 1.

Number of Reads for Each Sample that Match rRNA or Either One of the Two Organisms’ Genomes

Sample Raw Reads rRNA (Mtb + Mouse) Mouse M. tuberculosis
rRNA % of Raw Reads Aligned to GRcm38 – Rel. 94 % of Raw Reads Aligned to Erdman GCA000668235.1 % of Raw Reads
AM 1 ∼25,000 infected cells 131.5 M 19.5 M 14.8% 96.2 M 73% 1.2 M 0.9%
AM 2 ∼18,000 infected cells 176.5 M 41.1 M 23.3% 96.6 M 55% 1.3 M 0.75%
AM 3 ∼12,000 infected cells 309.8 M 107.7 M 34.8% 51.4 M 17% 0.95 M 0.3%
IM 1 ∼25,000 infected cells 140.6 M 15.3 M 10.9% 72 M 51% 1.2 M 0.85%
IM 2 ∼40,000 infected cells 47.5 M 6.6 M 13.9% 33.2 M 70% 0.9 M 1.9%
IM 3 ∼35,000 infected cells 83.7 M 12.2 M 14.6% 54.3 M 65% 1 M 1.2%
Mtb broth 1 12.1 M 1.8 M 14.7% 10 M 83%
Mtb broth 2 13.7 M 1.4 M 10.4% 12 M 87.5%
Mtb broth3 15.1 M 0.8 M 5.4% 12.4 M 82%
Mtb – BMDM 1 32.6 M 0.08 M 0.25% 28.5 M 87%
Mtb – BMDM 2 35 M 0.11 M 0.31% 31.6 M 90%
Mtb – BMDM 3 25.5 M 0.11 M 0.47% 23.6 M 93%

For the in vivo samples, the number of sorted cells is reported in the “Sample” column. As a result of the difference in the number of infected cells between AMs and IMs at 14 days post-infection, a lower bacterial RNA enrichment and higher sequencing depth were preferred in some AM samples to compensate for the reduced RNA yield.