Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD000522. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000522.pub2

Comparison 3. SHS fixation with cement versus standard SHS (no cement).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Fracture fixation complications 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Cut‐out 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Loosening of the plate 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 Delayed union 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.4 Reoperation 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Wound infection 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Length of hospital stay 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Mortality 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Pain at 6 months (visual analogue scale: 0 none to 100 worst) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.1 Global pain 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.2 On walking 50 feet 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Hip abductor strength (% of unaffected side) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected