Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 22;2002(3):CD001117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001117

Berg 1997.

Methods DESIGN: Randomised Controlled Trial 
 METHOD OF RANDOMISATION: the word "random" stated ; stratified according to severity (moderate/severe) 
 METHOD OF ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT: not described. 
 OUTCOME ASSESSOR BLINDING: not stated. 
 WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUTS: all subjects accounted for.
Participants Eligible: 68 
 Randomised: 55 
 Completed: 54 (Intervention 31; Control 24) 
 Age: Overall mean: 50 yrs (sd 16) 
 Sex: Male / Female 19/36 
 Asthma Diagnosis: Doctor's diagnosis 
 Recruitment: Rural community 
 Diseases Included: not specified ‐ but smokers were included 
 Major exclusions: Not specified 
 Baseline: 
 FEV1: Patients described their asthma as moderate to severe. 
 PEF: am intervention 360 (sd 105); control 365 (sd 137) 
 pm intervention 347 (sd 107); control 371 (sd 140) 
 Exacerbations: not stated
Interventions Setting: community based education program 
 Type: Small group education and self monitoring of peak flow and symptoms. 
 Control: No special education. Controls kept an asthma diary (symptoms and PEF) for one week at baseline and one week at the end of the study for outcome assessment. 
 Duration: 6 x 2 hour training sessions ie 1/week over 6 weeks.
Outcomes Compliance, symptoms, am PEFR, pm PEFR, Asthma self‐efficacy, Asthma self‐management.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available (Cochrane Grade B)