Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;2016(5):CD000938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000938.pub2

Comparison 1. Induction versus expectant management.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1.1 Caesarean section 4 1190 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.76, 1.09]
1.2 Instrumental delivery 4 1190 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.65, 1.13]
1.3 Shoulder dystocia 4 1190 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.37, 0.98]
1.4 Brachial plexus injury 4 1190 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.21 [0.01, 4.28]
1.5 Fracture (any) 4 1190 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.05, 0.79]
1.6 Low Apgar score (5 minutes) 2 858 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.51 [0.25, 9.02]
1.7 Low arterial cord blood pH (< 7.10) 1 818 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.46, 2.22]
1.8 Spontaneous delivery 4 1190 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.09 [0.99, 1.20]
1.9 Third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tears 2 858 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.70 [1.04, 13.17]
1.10 Perinatal mortality 3 917 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Not estimable
1.11 Intracranial haemorrhage 3 933 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.19, 5.96]
1.12 Convulsions 1 40 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Not estimable
1.13 Admission to neonatal intensive care unit 2 858 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.35, 1.24]
1.14 Mean birthweight (g) 4 1190 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐178.03 [‐315.26, ‐40.81]
1.15 Sensitivity analysis: Mean birthweight (g) 4 1190 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐169.81 [‐321.36, ‐18.25]
1.16 Non pre‐specified outcome: significant shoulder dystocia 1 818 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.12, 0.85]
1.17 Non pre‐specified outcome: serious neonatal morbidity or death (composite outcome) 1 818 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.15, 0.71]
1.18 Non pre‐specified outcome: use of phototherapy 1 818 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.68 [1.07, 2.66]
1.19 Non pre‐specified outcome: cephalohematoma 1 273 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.07 [0.53, 8.13]