Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD000448. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000448.pub3

HDTSG 2002.

Methods Concealment: central telephone randomization 
 Blinding: double‐blind (double‐dummy) 
 Drop‐outs/withdrawals: 31 of 113 in hypericum group, 32 of 116 in placebo group, and 32 of 111 in sertraline group 
 Jadad score: 2‐2‐1 
 IV score: 1‐1‐1‐0.5‐0.5‐0.5
Participants Number of patients included/analyzed: 340/340 
 Demographics: 66% female, mean age 43 years 
 Diagnosis: major depression (DSM‐IV) 
 Setting: 12 academic and community psychiatric research clinics in the US 
 Baseline: HAMD scores 23.1 +/‐ 2.7 (hypericum), 22.7 +/‐ 2.7 (placebo), 22.5 +/‐ 2.5 (sertraline)
Interventions Treatment: Hypericum LI 160 extract 900 to 1500 mg for 8 weeks 
 Control 1: Placebo for 8 weeks 
 Control 2: Sertraline 50 to 100 mg for 8 weeks
Outcomes Observation period: 1 weeks run‐in, 8 weeks treatment, 18 weeks follow‐up for responders 
 Physician‐rated: Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD, response = at least 50% reduction or score < 10), Clinical Global Impression Index (CGI), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) 
 Patient‐rated: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
Notes Trial funded by public institution (NIH). Large proportion of patients with chronic depression. Some unblinding detected (sole trial which reported a check of blinding). Authors provided additional data
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate