Litz 2004.
| Methods | Randomisation: 'Randomly assigned' Allocation concealment: Not yet known Exclusion after randomisation: Not yet known | |
| Participants | Setting: US arm Inclusion: Platoons deployed on peacekeeping mission Exclusion: None reported | |
| Interventions | Comparison: Critical incident stress debriefing (CISD) (Mitchell model) versus stress education versus survey only Time between event and intervention: Not reported | |
| Outcomes | Post traumatic stress (PCL); Depression (CES‐D), General well‐being (GHQ); Aggressive behaviour; Marital satisfaction; Perceived Organisational Support; Morale. | |
| Notes | Assessor blind to intervention: Unclear Assessment standardised: | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | B ‐ Unclear |