Skip to main content
. 2002 Apr 22;2002(2):CD000560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000560

Litz 2004.

Methods Randomisation: 
 'Randomly assigned' 
 Allocation concealment: 
 Not yet known 
 Exclusion after randomisation: 
 Not yet known
Participants Setting: 
 US arm 
 Inclusion: 
 Platoons deployed on peacekeeping mission 
 Exclusion: 
 None reported
Interventions Comparison: 
 Critical incident stress debriefing (CISD) (Mitchell model) versus stress education versus survey only 
 Time between event and intervention: 
 Not reported
Outcomes Post traumatic stress (PCL); Depression (CES‐D), General well‐being (GHQ); Aggressive behaviour; Marital satisfaction; Perceived Organisational Support; Morale.
Notes Assessor blind to intervention: 
 Unclear 
 Assessment standardised:
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear