Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 24;2005(1):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub2

Comparison 11. (2.2)Membranes sweeping versus vaginal prostaglandins: all women, unfavourable cervix.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3 Caesarean section 2 252 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.41, 1.08]
11 Instrumental vaginal delivery 2 252 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.1 [0.48, 2.50]
13 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes 2 252 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 7.91]
14 Neonatal intensive care unit admission 2 252 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.10, 1.38]
31 Not delivered before 42 weeks (not prespecified) 2 252 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.5 [0.25, 1.02]
36 'Formal' induction of labour (not prespecified) 1 70 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.44, 1.62]
38 Prelabour rupture of membranes (not prespecified) 1 70 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.18, 1.78]