| Cardoen et al., 2009 |
Belgium |
51 zoonotic pathogens |
-
1.
Severity of the disease for humans.
-
2.
Occurrence of the disease in the Belgian population.
-
3.
Occurrence in live animals in Belgium.
-
4.
Severity of the disease for animals and commercial and economic impact of disease for the sector.
-
5.
Occurrence of the agent in food or in carcasses.
|
-
•
High importance: none.
-
•
Significant importance: Toxoplasma gondii, Cryptosporidium parvum, Echinococcus granulosus, Echinococcus multilocularis, Fasciola hepatica, Giardia duodenalis.
-
•
Moderate importance: Taenia saginata, Trichinella spp., Sarcocystis bovihominis.
-
•
Low importance: Anisakis simplex, Sarcocystis suihominis, Taenia spp. (other than saginata), Dioctophyma renale, Clonorchis sinensis, Balantidium coli, Diphyllobothrium, Linguatula serrata.
|
| Havelaar et al., 2010 |
The Netherlands |
86 zoonotic pathogens |
-
1.
Probability of introduction into the Netherlands.
-
2.
Transmission in animal reservoirs.
-
3.
Economic damage in animal reservoirs.
-
4.
Animal-human transmission.
-
5.
Transmission between humans.
-
6.
Morbidity (disability weight).
-
7.
Mortality (case-fatality ratio).
|
-
•
High priority: Toxoplasma gondii.
-
•
Medium priority: Echinococcus multilocularis, Trichinella spp.
-
•
Low priority: Cryptosporidium parvum, Ascaris suum, Giardia duodenalis, Toxocara canis/cati, Taenia solium, Echinococcus granulosus, Anisakis simplex, Taenia saginata, Fasciola hepatica.
|
| Balabanova et al., 2011 |
Germany |
127 pathogens |
-
1.
Incidence (including illness and symptomatic infection).
-
2.
Work and school absenteeism.
-
3.
Health care utilization (primary care and hospitalization).
-
4.
Chronicity of illness or sequelae.
-
5.
Case fatality rate.
-
6.
Proportion of events requiring public health actions.
-
7.
Trend.
-
8.
Public attention (including political agenda and public perception).
-
9.
Prevention possibilities and needs (including vaccines).
-
10.
Treatment possibilities and needs (including AMR).
|
-
•
Highest priority: none.
-
•
High priority: Cryptosporidium parvum/hominis, Giardia duodenalis, Toxoplasma gondii.
-
•
Medium priority: Trichinella spiralis.
-
•
Low priority: Cyclospora cayetanensis, Entamoeba histolytica, Helminhts (flukes), Helminths (nematodes), Helminths (tapeworms).
|
| Ng and Sargeant, 2012 |
Canada and US |
62 zoonoses |
-
1.
Case-fatality in humans.
-
2.
Incidence of the disease in the Canadian/US human population in the last five years.
-
3.
Case-fatality in animals.
-
4.
Incidence of the disease in the Canadian/US animal population in the last five years.
-
5.
Severity of illness in humans.
-
6.
Disease trend in Canada/US in the last five years in humans.
-
7.
Transmission potential between humans.
-
8.
Duration of illness in humans.
-
9.
Transmission potential from animals to humans.
-
10.
Disease trend in Canada/US in the last five years in animals.
-
11.
Economic burden in humans.
-
12.
Transmission potential from humans to animals.
-
13.
Duration of illness in animals.
-
14.
Transmission potential between animals.
-
15.
Economic and social burden on trade in animals.
-
16.
Severity of illness in animals.
-
17.
High risk groups in humans.
-
18.
Control measures in humans.
-
19.
Control measures in animals.
-
20.
How much is known scientifically about the disease.
-
21.
High risk groups in animals.
|
-
•
Canada: Cryptosporidiosis (14), Giardiosis (19), Toxoplasmosis (22), Echinococcosis (37), Toxocarosis (38), Trichinellosis (49), Cystiocercosis/Taeniosis (57), Cyclosporosis (59).
-
•
US: Cryptosporidiosis (23), Toxoplasmosis (32), Giardiosis (33), Echinococcosis (41), Toxocarosis (43), Cysticercosis/Taeniosis (45), Trichinellosis (55), Cyclosporosis (57).
|
| Humblet et al., 2012 |
Europe |
100 animal diseases and zoonoses |
57 criteria, including 17 for epidemiology, 8 for prevention/control, 16 for economy/trade, 12 for public health, and 4 for society |
-
•
High importance: Echinococcosis/hydatidosis.
-
•
Significant importance: Porcine cysticercosis, Trichinellosis.
-
•
Moderate importance: none.
-
•
Relative low importance: none.
|
| Dahl et al., 2015 |
Sweden |
106 pathogens |
-
1.
Incidence (including illness, symptomatic infections, asymptomatic infections but not carriership or normal flora).
-
2.
Work and school absenteeism.
-
3.
Health care utilization (primary health care and hosptitalization).
-
4.
Chronicity of illness or sequelae.
-
5.
Case fatality rate.
-
6.
Proportion of events requiring public health actions.
-
7.
Trend.
-
8.
Public attention (including political agenda and public perception).
-
9.
Prevention possibilities and needs (including vaccines).
-
10.
Treatment possibilities and needs (including AMR).
|
-
•
Highest priority: Echinococcus multilocularis.
-
•
High priority: Cryptosporidium parvum/hominis, Giardia duodenalis.
-
•
Medium priority: Echinococcus granulosus, Enterobius vermicularis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spiralis.
-
•
Low priority: Entamoeba histolytica, Helminhts (tapeworms), Helminths (flukes), Helminths (nematodes).
|
| Kadohira et al., 2015 |
Japan |
98 zoonoses |
-
1.
No. of human cases/year (incidence).
-
2.
Human-to-human spread.
-
3.
Case fatality rate.
-
4.
Availability of diagnostic test.
-
5.
Treatment.
-
6.
Preventive methods.
-
7.
Frequency of entry to Japan.
|
Echinococcosis: 16/20 most important zoonoses |
