Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD000368. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000368.pub3

Benson 2006.

Methods Allocation: randomised (serially numbered opaque envelopes).
 Blindness: all staff and researchers blind to allocation, participants either uncertain of intervention or knew receiving IP.
 Duration: 30 days after CABG.
 Consent: given.
Participants Diagnosis: people scheduled to receive non‐emergency CABG.
 N=1802.
 Age: >18 years, mean ˜ 63 years.
 Sex: 1293M, 509F.
 Exclusions: scheduled for emergent CABG, CABG more than 14 days after enrolment, other planned surgery within 30 days of CABG, minimally invasive CABG, ongoing chest pain, unstable angina or CABG with planned valve replacement, stent, angioplasty or carotid endarterectomy.
Interventions 1. Intercessory prayer: standard care + IP with participants uncertain if receiving IP (daily prayer by 3 Christian groups given specific phrase to add onto to their study prayer). N=604.
 2. Intercessory prayer: standard care + IP with participants aware receiving IP (prayer as above). N=601.
 3. Standard care: standard care + participants uncertain if receiving IP. N=597.
Outcomes Death.
 Clinical state: major event, complications.
 Service use: re‐admission to hospital.
 Leaving the study early.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised ‐ no further details.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Opaque envelopes.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Carers and researchers unaware of group of allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Clearly described.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Reporting rather un‐selective, too many outcomes reported.
Other bias High risk Several authors worked in institutions likely to be sympathetic to positive outcome of prayer.