| Bjordal, et al., 2008 |
Tendon Application 904nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vasselijen, et al. 41)
|
15 |
16 |
12 |
16 |
6 |
12 |
10 (1.41, 18.59) |
| Stergioulas, 39)
|
15 |
42 |
22.9 |
16 |
20.46 |
23.8 |
21.54 (4.83, 38.25) |
| Lam and Cheing, 33)
|
21 |
36.6 |
23.2 |
18 |
13.3 |
29.3 |
23.3 (6.52, 40.08) |
| |
| Tendon Application 632nm versus brace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oken, et al. 36)
|
20 |
28 |
12 |
20 |
14 |
9 |
14 (7.43, 20.57) |
| |
| Acupoint application 904nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lundeberg, Haker and Thomas, 35)
|
38 |
26 |
20 |
19 |
22 |
20 |
4 (−7.01, 15.01) |
| |
| Tendon Application 1064 nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Basford, Sheffiled and Cieslak, 28)
|
23 |
31.4 |
36 |
24 |
32.5 |
28 |
−1.10 (−19.59, 17.39) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: 11.80 (7.54, 16.07) |
|
| |
|
| Smidt, et al., 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMD(95% CI) |
| Laser Vs Placebo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vasselijen, et al. 41)
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
−0.46 (−1.19, 0.27) |
| Lundeberg, Haker and Thomas, 35)
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
−2 (−2.77, −1.22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMD(95% CI) |
| |
| Laser versus US + Friction Massage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vasselijen, et al. 41)
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.84 (0.09, 1.58) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMD(95% CI) |
| |
| Laser versus laser |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lundeberg, Haker and Thomas, 35)
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
−1.00 (−1.67, −0.33) |
|
| |
|
| Bisset, et al., 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMD(95% CI) |
| Laser v placebo (NdYAG 204 mW/cm2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Basford, Sheffiled and Cieslak, 28)
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.58 (−0.01 to 1.17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMD(95% CI) |
| |
| Laser v placebo (GaAs 30 mW/830 nm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Krasheninnikoff, et al. 32)
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.03 (−0.62 to 0.69) |
| |
| Laser v placebo (HeNe 632.8 nm, 1.56 mW; GaAs 904 nm, 0.07 mW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lundeberg, Haker and Thomas, 35)
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.98 (0.30 to 1.66) |
