Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb;49:101226. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101226

Table 2.

Exposure: Screen time (TV, Tablet, Phone, Playing computer games, Using the internet).

Outcome Age group Unfavorably related to exposure Favorably related to exposure Summary
N participants (total (if n = 1) or range) Quality
n/N (%)* P value#
Sleep duration Infants [17,18,47] weekday [47] weekend dayb 3/5 (60.0) 0.375 Longitudinal: 208
Cross-sectional: 208 to 1676
Very lowa
Night awakenings Infants [43] 1/1 (100.0) 0.500 Cross-sectional: 1033 Very lowa
Sleep latency Infants [30] 1/1 (100.0) 0.500 Cross-sectional: 208 Very lowa
Sleep duration Toddlers [17,18], [38]b, [47] weekend day [51]b, [52], [47] weekday 7/8 (87.5) 0.035 Longitudinal: 369 to 1202
Cross-sectional: 173 to 1676
Very lowa
Night awakenings Toddlers [51]b 2/2 (100.0) 0.250 Longitudinal: 369
Cross-sectional: 497
Very lowa
Bedtime Toddlers [51]b 2/2 (100.0) 0.250 Longitudinal: 369
Cross-sectional: 497
Very lowa
Sleep latency Toddlers [30,51,51] 3/3 (100.0) 0.125 Longitudinal: 369
Cross-sectional: 208 to 497
Very lowa
Sleep quality Toddlers [52] 1/1 (100.0) Cross-sectional: 173 Very lowa
Sleep stability Toddlers [52] 1/1 (100.0) Cross-sectional: 173 Very lowa
Sleep duration Preschoolers [17,28,29,34] TV viewing, tablet use, iPod use [35,40,42,45,50,50,51,53], [34] Smartphone, laptop 12/13 (92.3) 0.002 Longitudinal: 3427
Cross-sectional: 52 to 39,813
Very lowa
Night awakenings Preschoolers [41]b, [53] [51] 2/3 (66.6) 0.500 Longitudinal: 1346
Cross-sectional: 415 to 2590
Very lowa
Bedtime Preschoolers [46] Computer use [51,53], 3/3 (100.0) 0.125 Cross-sectional: 415 to 2590 Very lowa
Sleep latency Preschoolers [51,53] 2/2 (100.0) 0.250 Cross-sectional: 415 to 2590 Very lowa
Sleep quality Preschoolers [32,37,48] 3/3 (100.0) 0.125 Cross-sectional: 330 to 617 Very lowa
Daytime napping Preschoolers [29] TV time [28] Computer games 1/2 (50.0) 0.750 Cross-sectional: 39,813 Very lowa

*n = number of associations showing unfavorable association, N = total number of associations for the specific exposure-outcome relationship reported; #two-sided p-value from the binomial probability test. Small p-value indicates higher probability that the results are valid.

a

Quality of evidence was downgraded due to serious risk of bias. Quality rating of individual studies can be found in Table S1.

b

Indicates Longitudinal study.