Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 30;11(1):1717826. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1717826

Table 2.

Fit statistics based on the ITQ in the four Asian samples and the total sample.

Sample χ2 CFI TLI RMSEA (90% CI) ΔRMSEA
Hong Kong (n = 428)          
 First-order model 87.832* .996 .994 .054 (.039-.069)  
 Second-order model 161.746* .991 .987 .076 (.063-.088) .022
China (n = 340)          
 First-order model 111.599* .988 .980 .074 (.058-.090)  
 Second-order model 148.560* .984 .977 .080 (.065-.094) .006
Taiwan (n = 254)          
 First-order model^ 65.457* .997 .995 .052 (.028-.073)  
 Second-order model 99.666* .994 .992 .066 (.048-.085) .014
Japan (n = 324)          
 First-order model 85.832* .994 .990 .061 (.043-.078)  
 Second-order model 106.036* .993 .990 .062 (.047-.078) .001
Full sample (n = 1346)          
 First-order model 157.495* .996 .994 .048 (.040-.055)  
 Second-order model 456.445* .987 .982 .080 (.074-.087) .032

*p < .001; χ2 = chi-square test (all first-order model have 39 degrees of freedom and all second-order model have 47 degrees of freedom); CFI = comparative fit indices; TLI = Tucker Lewis indices; RMSEA (90% CI) = Root mean square of approximation (90% confidence intervals); ΔRMSEA = change in the RMSEA between the two models; ^correlation of 1.002 between Affective Dysregulation and Disturbed Relationships.