. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar 18;45(11):2010–2035. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000694

Table 4.

Results of analyses on probability of pronominal reference. Experiments 1, 2 and 3 combined. “PreM” and “PostM” stand for Pre-modified and Post-modified, respectively.

Analysis	Contrast	β	SE	z	p
Modification Type	PreM_Target vs. Baseline	.34	.12	2.82	.004
	PostM_Target vs. Baseline	.63	.12	4.99	<.001
	PreM_Target vs. PostM_Target	.29	.12	2.31	.02
Relative Richness	Modifier Position	−.00	.06	−.07	.93
	NP Type	.32	.06	5.23	<.001
	Modifier Position ×NP Type	.31	.12	2.51	.01
	NP Type within PreM	−.18	.12	−1.48	.13
	NP Type within PostM	−.75	.14	−5.32	<.001