Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229423

Table 2. RNA yield of different RNA extraction procedures according to NanoDrop and 2100 Bioanalyzer.

RNA extraction procedure NanoDrop (ND) 2100 Bioanalyzer (BA) ND vs. BA
RNA yield (ng) RNA yield (ng) p value
Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2
QZL-EM 929.1 ± 72.2 1038.5 ± 111.7 385.0 ± 77.0 410.7 ± 117.6 0.020 0.037
RNL-EM 745.6 ± 69.1 667.3 ± 58.8 333.7 ± 160.3 410.7 ± 160.3 0.035 0.057
EML-EM 647.6 ± 89.9 714.3 ± 40.9 333.7 ± 117.6 410.7 ± 117.6 0.030 0.044
QZL-RE 1076.7 ± 42.3 1371.0 ± 186.5 700.0 ± 132.3 883.3 ± 251.7 0.020 0.015
RNL-RE 432.8 ± 92.0 296.7 ± 51.3 350.0 ± 50.0 300.0 ± 100.0 0.418 0.921
RLT-RE 913.3 ± 9.0 1006.2 ± 84.9 700.0 ± 50.0 883.3 ± 125.8 0.017 0.419
QZL-RP 1037.3 ± 61.4 2185.9 ± 178.5 548.2 ± 193.2 716.8 ± 193.2 0.072 < 0.001
RNL-RP 1307.2 ± 160.7 1343.4 ± 90.7 885.5 ± 253.0 969.8 ± 386.5 0.036 0.171
RPL-RP 3299.5 ± 459.1 3634.8 ± 301.0 1560.2 ± 193.2 2066.2 ± 318.4 0.029 0.019

Results are means and standards deviation (in ng) from three independent extractions.

p values were calculated using the t test for paired samples.

Run 1. Storage of PBMCs for one day. RNA quantification after storage of RNA for 83 days

Run 2. Storage of PBMCs for 83 days. RNA quantification after storage of RNA for 127 days