Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 21;8(3):E313–E325. doi: 10.1055/a-1073-7593

Table 3. Subgroup analyses for R0 resection rates.

Subgroup Number of studies included Number of patients Pooled rate (95 % CI) I2 P value
Difficult colorectal polyps 14 10 11 12 13 14 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 324  80 (67–91) 81.83 % < 0.01
Colorectal early carcinoma 7 11 13 14 17 21 25  88  78 (54–95) 68.25 % < 0.01
Colorectal SELs 8 10 12 13 17 18 20 23 26  38 100 (95–100)  0 0.99
Upper GI SELs 5 3 10 14 16 18 24  30  81 (58–97) 47.97 % 0.09
Devices
Lower EFTR
  • FTRD

12 13 14 15 17 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 508  84 (77–89) 60.71 % < 0.01
  • OTSC

5 10 11 12 18 24  21  68 (31–197) 65.37 % 0.02
Upper EFTR
  • FTRD

2 14 16   5  80 (47–100) N/A 1 N/A 1
  • OTSC

4 3 10 18 24  22  80 (45–100) 68.62 % 1 0.02 1

SELs, subepithelial lesions; EFTR, endoscopic full-thickness resection; FTRD, full-thickness resection device; OTSC, over the scope clips

1

Insufficient numbers/degrees of freedom (2)