Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 21;8(3):E388–E395. doi: 10.1055/a-1072-4830

Table 2. Outcomes in different type of L-PAO according to Toyonaga’s classification.

Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 3a Overall P value 1
Effectiveness outcomes n/N (%)
En Bloc resection rate 3 /3 (100 %) 7 /7(100 %) 11 /11 100 %) 11 /11(100 %) 32 /32(100 %) NA
R0 resection rate 3 /3(100 %) 6 /7(85.7 %)  9 /11(81.8 %) 11 /11(100 %) 29 /32(90.6 %) 0.266
Curative resection 3 /3(100 %) 6 /7(85.7 %)  9 /11(81.8 %) 11 /11(100 %) 29 /32(90.6 %) 0.266
Adverse events n/N (%)
Per-operative perforation 1 /3(33.3 %) 3 /7(42.9 %)  6 /11(54.5 %) 2 3  1 /11(9.1 %) 11 /32(34.4 %) 0.123
Delayed perforation with peritonitis 0 0  1 /11(9.1 %)  0  1 /32(3.6 %) 0.344
Acute appendicitis 0 0  1 /11(9.1 %) 4  0  1 /28(3.6 %) 0.344
Additional surgery 0 0  3 /11(27.3 %) 5 6  0  3 /32(9.4 %) 5 6 0.033
1

Comparison between Type 3 without prior appendectomy and others, using Fisher’s exact test

2

One patient developed delayed local peritonitis, resolved with just antibiotics

3

One patient developed postoperative peritonitis requiring additional surgery

4

One patient with per-operative perforation developed peritonitis and postoperative appendicitis

5

One patient had R1 resection with a synchronous invasive adenocarcinoma in the descending colon and underwent additional surgery, Postoperative complication-related surgery rate is 6.3 % (2 cases).

6

Postoperative complication related surgery rate is 6.3% (2 cases).