Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;77(3):188–193. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105926

Table 3.

Association between HAV exposure and VPT: increase of VPT (dB) per 10-fold increase in exposure (hour·m/s2)

Frequency Dominant second finger (n=104) Dominant fifth finger (n=102) Non-dominant second finger (n=102) Non-dominant fifth finger (n=103)
Hz Unstandardised coefficient B
(95% CI)
Unstandardised coefficient B
(95% CI)
Unstandardised coefficient B
(95% CI)
Unstandardised coefficient B
(95% CI)
8 1.42 (0.57 to 2.27)* 1.47 (0.61 to 2.32)* 0.85 (0.02 to 1.67)* 0.97 (0.12 to 1.82)*
16 1.28 (0.53 to 2.03)* 1.40 (0.57 to 2.23)* 0.98 (0.08 to 1.87)* 0.94 (0.06 to 1.81)*
32 1.11 (0.37 to 1.84)* 1.14 (0.27 to 2.01)* 0.99 (0.14 to 1.84)* 0.53 (−0.40 to 1.46)
64 1.52 (0.50 to 2.55)* 1.83 (0.78 to 2.88)* 1.38 (0.31 to 2.45)* 1.10 (−0.06 to 2.26)
125 1.64 (0.59 to 2.69)* 2.16 (0.72 to 3.59)* 1.63 (0.35 to 2.91)* 1.59 (0.08 to 3.09)*
250 2.40 (1.09 to 3.61)* 2.39 (0.57 to 4.21)* 1.99 (0.46 to 3.51)* 2.26 (0.56 to 3.96)*
500 1.99 (0.56 to 3.43)* 2.76 (1.03 to 4.48)* 2.16 (0.42 to 3.90)* 2.07 (0.36 to 3.77)*

All associations were age adjusted, using categories of age <60 and ages 60–69 years.

*P≤0.05.

HAV, hand–arm vibration; VPT, vibration perception threshold.