Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 20;57(1):27–37. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00680-2

Table 2.

Indications for leadless pacemaker (LP) therapy according to the underlying arrhythmia: clinical evidence is graded as A, B, or C; * good candidate for LP implantation (evidence B) in elderly, inactive patients

Good candidate for LP implantation (evidence B):

• Permanent AF and AV block or slow ventricular response

Possible candidate for LP implantation (evidence B):

• Transient sinus arrest or AV block with need of backup pacing and very low anticipated ventricular pacing rate (≤ 1–5% of beats)

Possible candidate for LP implantation under certain circumstances (evidence C):

• Transient or permanent AV block with increased anticipated ventricular pacing rate (> 1–5% of beats)

• Sick sinus syndrome with transient or permanent bradycardia with increased anticipated ventricular pacing rate (> 1–5% of beats)*

• Recurrent syncope due to vagally induced cardio-inhibition (sinus bradycardia or transient AV block)