Table 2.
Correlation analysis between Lg FGF19 and other parameters.
| Control | T2DM | HCC | T2DM-HCC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | r | p | r | p | |
| Age | −0.215 | 0.282 | 0.176 | 0.381 | 0.168 | 0.533 | 0.056 | 0.877 |
| BMI | −0.242 | 0.224 | 0.006 | 0.975 | 0.481 | 0.059 | −0.390 | 0.265 |
| FPG | −0.273 | 0.168 | 0.047 | 0.815 | 0.162 | 0.550 | 0.395 | 0.259 |
| ALT† | −0.152 | 0.451 | −0.409 | 0.034 | −0.068 | 0.802 | 0.145 | 0.690 |
| γGT† | −0.450 | 0.018 | −0.042 | 0.836 | 0.536 | 0.032 | 0.357 | 0.311 |
| ALB | −0.266 | 0.179 | −0.371 | 0.057 | −0.036 | 0.894 | −0.104 | 0.774 |
| TBA† | 0.400 | 0.039 | 0.477 | 0.012 | 0.684 | 0.003 | 0.673 | 0.033 |
| TBIL† | −0.363 | 0.063 | −0.035 | 0.861 | −0.103 | 0.704 | 0.010 | 0.978 |
| eGFR† | 0.424 | 0.027 | −0.005 | 0.980 | 0.062 | 0.819 | 0.047 | 0.898 |
| Cys-C∗ | −0.227 | 0.255 | 0.384 | 0.048 | −0.058 | 0.833 | −0.300 | 0.400 |
| TC | −0.485 | 0.010 | −0.070 | 0.728 | 0.026 | 0.923 | −0.333 | 0.347 |
| TG | −0.333 | 0.090 | −0.229 | 0.251 | −0.220 | 0.413 | −0.064 | 0.861 |
| LDL | −0.528 | 0.005 | 0.132 | 0.511 | 0.024 | 0.931 | −0.079 | 0.828 |
| AFP† | 0.001 | 0.998 | 0.140 | 0.486 | 0.540 | 0.031 | 0.560 | 0.092 |
| CEA† | −0.081 | 0.689 | −0.091 | 0.650 | 0.078 | 0.774 | 0.464 | 0.177 |
†Log-transformed variables; Pearson correlation analysis for normally distributed variables; ∗Spearman correlation analysis for nonnormally distributed variables; control: healthy control; T2DM: newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients; HCC: newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma patients; T2DM-HCC: type 2 diabetes mellitus combined newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Total: total population. Abbreviations are same as in Table 1. p values <0.05 were considered significant.