Table 3. Predictors of indoor spatial repellent use .

Predictor Values	Response Variable: Self-reported Use of Indoor Spatial Repellents
	Unadjusted Models			Adjusted Model
	UOR	95% CI	P value	AOR	95% CI	P value
Perceived response efficacy	0.95	0.68-1.33	0.78	0.03	0.00-3.29	0.145
Perceived self-efficacy	1.95	1.40-2.71	0.00*	0.19	0.00-18.56	0.480
Perceived severity	1.31	0.87-1.96	0.197	11.29	0.03-4569.93	0.429
Perceived vulnerability	0.74	0.49-1.13	0.162	0.21	0.00-10.20	0.429
Chikungunya knowledge	1.01	0.91-1.13	0.796	0.02	0.00-0.31	0.005**
Perceived response efficacy * perceived self-efficacy	1.07	1.02-1.12	0.008**	2.20	0.73-6.66	0.163
Perceived Chikungunya severity * perceived vulnerability	1	0.94-1.07	0.974	0.23	0.04-1.24	0.087
Chikungunya knowledge * perceived severity	1.02	0.99-1.04	0.199	1.55	1.05-2.29	0.029*
Chikungunya knowledge * perceived vulnerability	0.1	0.98-1.02	0.894	1.88	1.18-3.02	0.009**

*P value significance at P <0.05; **P value significance at P <0.01.

Abbreviation: UOR, unadjusted odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio.

Note: Data reported under “unadjusted models” columns represents a model for each row. While not reported here, the hierarchical adjusted (multiple) logistic regression model also included socio-demographic factors (Step 1).