Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 22;20:168. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4900-8

Table 3.

Etiological distribution and sensitivity for all pathogens detected by two methods

Pathogens Total Oropharyngeal swab Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid P valuea
No. identified Sensitivity (95% CI) No. identified Sensitivity (95% CI)
RSV 19 15 79 (54–94) 16 84 (60–97) NS
SP 17 14 82 (57–96) 10 59 (33–82) NS
Hi 16 12 75 (48–93) 11 69 (41–89) NS
MP 13 8 62 (32–86) 12 92 (64–100) NS
Adv 7 4 57 (18–90) 7 100 (59–100) NS
BP 5 3 60 (15–95) 4 80 (28–99) NS
HBov 5 3 60 (15–95) 4 80 (28–99) NS
PIV 4 4 100 (40–100) 3 75 (19–99) NS
MC 4 0 0 (0–60) 4 100 (40–100) < 0.05
INF-A 3 1 33 (1–91) 3 100 (29–100) NS
INF-B 2 1 50 (1–99) 1 50 (1–99) NS
HMPV 2 1 50 (1–99) 2 100 (16–100) NS
All pathogens 97 67 69 (59–78) 79 81 (72–88) < 0.05

NS non-significant

Adv adenovirus, HBoV human bocavirus, HMPV human metapneumovirus, INF-A influenza A, INF-B influenza B, PIV parainfluenza viruses, RSV respiratory syncytial virus, BP Bordetella pertussis, Hi Haemophilus influenzae, MC Moraxella catarrhalis, MP Mycoplasma pneumoniae, SP Streptococcus pneumoniae

a Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test