Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Nov-Dec;32(6):530–537. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000407

Table 3.

Correlational matrix of key variables (N=71)

Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. Group 1.000
2. Age −.016 1.000
3. Education .153 −.077 1.000
4. Ejection Fraction −.022 .003 −.014 1.000
5. NYHA Class .106 −.225 .015 −.067 1.000
6. MAACL,a anxiety, 6m −.281* −.160 −.254* −.020 −.104 1.000
7. MAACL,a depression, 6m −.491 −.251* −.400 .036 −.022 .594 1.000
8. MAACL,a hostility, 6m −.293* −.173 −.331 −.031 −.151 .670 .544 1.000
9. MLHFQ,b physical, 6m −.221 −.063 −.214 .048 −.073 .262* .388 .310 1.000
10. MLHFQ,b emotional, 6m −.238* −.142 −.255* .133 −.158 .355 .455 .307 .544 1.000
11. MLHFQ,b overall, 6m −.219 −.209 −.240* .094 −.193 .254* .440 .368 .880 .650 1.000

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

a

Multiple Adjective Affect Check List; Higher scores reflect higher levels of dysphoria.

b

Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; Higher scores indicate greater symptom interference and lower QOL