Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Haematol. 2019 Jun 14;6(8):e419–e428. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30104-8

Table 2:

Response, bone marrow MRD, and combined response/bone marrow MRD by assessment

Cycle 3 (n=85) Post-iFCR* (n=85) Best Response (n=85)
CR 9 (10·6%) 20 (23·5%) 51 (60·0%)
CRi 6 (7·1%) 10 (11·8%) 5 (5·9%)
PR 59 (69·4%) 52 (61·2%) 28 (32·9%)
CR or CRi or PR 74 (87·1%) 82 (96·5%) 84 (98·8%)
BM-MRD− 40 (47·1%) 66 (77·6%) 71 (83·5%)
BM-MRD+ 38 (44·7%) 14 (16·5%) 14 (16·5%)
BM-MRD UNK 7 (8·2%) 5 (5·9%) 0

CR/MRD− 5 (5·9%) 19 (22·4%) NA
CR/MRD+ 4 (4·7%) 1 (1·2%) NA
CRi/MRD− 4 (4·7%) 9 (10·6%) NA
CRi/MRD+ 1 (1·2%) 1 (1·2%) NA
PR/MRD− 31 (36·5%) 38 (44·7%) NA
PR/MRD+ 28 (32·9%) 12 (14·1%) NA

BM-uMRD=minimal residual disease in the bone marrow. CR=complete response. CRi=complete response with incomplete count recovery. FCR=fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, plus rituximab. MRD=minimum residual disease. NA=not applicable. PR=partial response. UNK=unknown.

*

Post-iFCR evaluations occurred at 1 month instead of 2 months in seven patients due to scheduling issues.

CR and CRi were combined when evaluating the primary trial endpoint of BM-uMRD CR post-iFCR.

Because of optional sampling times and missed samples, the best response cannot be defined and are listed as NA.