Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 28;21(3):838. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030838

Table 5.

Processes associated with the pairwise test stratifications.

# Test Stratification Subgroup (n) Process p
1 PIR
Not resistant/resistant
BDX008– (57) Wound healing 0.048
ICB Resistant (76) Innate immune response 0.012
Wound healing 0.013
VeriStrat Good (78) Innate immune response 0.011
Wound healing 0.014
2 ICB sensitive/resistant BDX008+ (43) Complement 0.026 *
Type 1 immune response 0.049 *
PIR Not Resistant (70) Complement <0.001
Acute inflammatory response <0.001
Acute phase reaction 0.001
Immune tolerance/suppression 0.007
IFN γ signaling/response 0.011
3 BDX008 +/− ICB Resistant (76) Acute phase reaction <0.001
Innate immune response 0.031
Acute inflammatory response 0.031
Type 17 immune response 0.032
IFN γ signaling/response 0.049
PIR Not Resistant (70) Acute phase reaction <0.001
IFN γ signaling/response 0.001
Acute inflammatory response 0.003
Immune tolerance/suppression 0.013
Type 17 immune response 0.013
Complement 0.020
4 VeriStrat (VSG/VSP) PIR Not Resistant (70) Immune tolerance/suppression <0.001 *
Acute phase reaction 0.001 *
Type 17 immune response 0.007 *
Complement 0.008 *

* p-values calculated using the protein set enrichment analysis (PSEA) method with the standard enrichment score (ES) definition in Subramanian et al. [5] rather than the ES defined averaged over 25 splits of the dataset defined in Roder et al. [59].