Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 1;17(3):907. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030907

Table 4.

Adjusted effects of work-to-family conflict, family-to-work conflict, and the WHB on job satisfaction.

Variable Model 3 Model 4
b(se) t b(se) t
Work-to-family conflict (WFC) −0.20(0.06) −3.48 *** −0.15(0.06) −2.75 **
Family-to-work conflict (FWC) 0.09(0.07) 1.37 0.07(0.06) 1.10
Work-health balance (WHB) 0.25(0.04) 6.7 *** 0.20(0.04) 5.11 ***
Age −0.03(0.007) −3.8 *** −0.01(0.005) −2.4 *
Work ability - - 0.03(0.01) 2.35 *
WFC*moderator 1 −0.01(0.005) −2.50 * - -
FWC*moderator 1 0.01(0.006) 2.54 * - -
WHB*moderator 1 0.001(0.003) 0.39 −0.01(0.005) −2.57 *
Marital status (no partner) 0.24(0.12) 2.11 * 0.28(0.11) 2.45 *
Parental status (no children) −0.34(0.12) −2.98 ** −0.26(0.11) −2.34 *

*** = p < 0.001; ** = p < 0.01; * = p < 0.05; 1 In model 3, the moderator is age; in model 4, the moderator is work ability. Continuous variables in the interactions have been centered on the mean.