Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 8;21(3):1131. doi: 10.3390/ijms21031131

Table 1.

The citation rates of the most widely used antioxidant activity/antioxidant capacity (AOA/AOC) methods and frequency of abbreviation usage. Data are from the Scopus database. ABTS: 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), PP: potassium persulfate.

Method References of Basic Publications Citation Rate 1 Frequency of Abbreviation Use (Keywords Used)
TEAC [1,2,16] 13,220 3772 2 (“TEAC” or “Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity”) since 1993
ABTS/PP decolorization assay [1] 9845 10,109 (“ABTS antioxidant” or “ABTS antiradical” or “ABTS radical scavenging”) since 1988
DPPH [17,18,19,20] 11,177 35,136 (“DPPH antioxidant” or “DPPH antiradical” or “DPPH radical scavenging”) since 1955
FRAP [21,22,23] 11,040 9492 (“FRAP” or “Ferric reducing antioxidant power”) 3 since 1994
Folin–Ciocalteu [24,25,26,27] 7630 2803 (“Folin–Ciocalteu antioxidant”) since 1976
ORAC [28,29,30,31,32,33] 3478 3619 (“ORAC” or “Oxygen radical absorbance capacity”) since 1993
CUPRAC [34,35,36] 1260 685 (“CUPRAC” or “Cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity”) since 2004

1 From publication date to the end of 2018. 2 Possibly overestimated due to widespread usage of TEAC abbreviation for AOA/AOC results expression in different assays. 3 Words “rapamycin”, “photobleaching”, and “phosphatase” were excluded from this search to prevent overestimation due to other FRAP abbreviations not related to antioxidant activity assessment (i.e., fujimycin binding protein (FKBP)-rapamycin-associated protein, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, and fluoride-resistant acid phosphatase).