Table 1.
Method | References of Basic Publications | Citation Rate 1 | Frequency of Abbreviation Use (Keywords Used) |
---|---|---|---|
TEAC | [1,2,16] | 13,220 | 3772 2 (“TEAC” or “Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity”) since 1993 |
ABTS/PP decolorization assay | [1] | 9845 | 10,109 (“ABTS antioxidant” or “ABTS antiradical” or “ABTS radical scavenging”) since 1988 |
DPPH | [17,18,19,20] | 11,177 | 35,136 (“DPPH antioxidant” or “DPPH antiradical” or “DPPH radical scavenging”) since 1955 |
FRAP | [21,22,23] | 11,040 | 9492 (“FRAP” or “Ferric reducing antioxidant power”) 3 since 1994 |
Folin–Ciocalteu | [24,25,26,27] | 7630 | 2803 (“Folin–Ciocalteu antioxidant”) since 1976 |
ORAC | [28,29,30,31,32,33] | 3478 | 3619 (“ORAC” or “Oxygen radical absorbance capacity”) since 1993 |
CUPRAC | [34,35,36] | 1260 | 685 (“CUPRAC” or “Cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity”) since 2004 |
1 From publication date to the end of 2018. 2 Possibly overestimated due to widespread usage of TEAC abbreviation for AOA/AOC results expression in different assays. 3 Words “rapamycin”, “photobleaching”, and “phosphatase” were excluded from this search to prevent overestimation due to other FRAP abbreviations not related to antioxidant activity assessment (i.e., fujimycin binding protein (FKBP)-rapamycin-associated protein, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, and fluoride-resistant acid phosphatase).