Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.02.005

Table 5.

Association of dental fluorosis on the photographs with TAS after adjusting for sociodemographic variables (gender of the rater, SES, type of school and age) separately for the ratings of male and female photographs.

Photograph Gender Variable β SE P-value 95% CI
Male Fluorosis 9.25 0.47 <0.001 8.33–10.17
Gender of the rater −0.34 0.47 0.478 −1.26–0.59
SES 0.13 0.58 0.823 −1.01-1.27
Type of school 0.06 0.59 0.916 −1.09–1.22
Age
−0.14
0.53
0.794
−1.18–0.90
Female Fluorosis 8.56 0.42 <0.001 7.73–9.38
Gender of the rater 0.03 0.42 0.94 −0.80–0.86
SES 0.63 0.52 0.229 −0.40–1.65
Type of school 0.06 0.53 0.905 −0.97–1.10
Age 0.09 0.47 0.847 −0.84–1.02

Multiple linear regression; Dependent Variable: TAS.