Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Aug 8;20(1):129–140. doi: 10.1111/dom.13049

Table 3.

Exclusion of Patients without History of Metformin: Bladder Cancer Incidence among Initiators of Pioglitazone, Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4, and Sulfonylureas

Comparison Drug Follow-Up (Years), Median (IQR)* N Events Person-Time (Years) Rate Unadjusted HR (95% CI)§ Fully Adjusted HR (95% CI) ||
As-Treated Analyses
Overall
PIO vs. DPP PIO 1.17(0.67–2.21) 14,476 75 23,713 316.3 1.75(1.29–2.38) 1.82(1.28–2.59)
DPP 1.14(0.60–2.17) 32,088 91 50,400 180.6 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
PIO vs. SU PIO 1.17(0.67–2.17) 6,819 27 11,059 244.1 1.18(0.78–1.77) 1.21(0.79–1.85)
SU 1.31(0.65–2.58) 43,281 161 77,736 207.1 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Duration of Treatment Restricted To 2 Years
PIO vs. DPP PIO 1.17(0.67–1.97) 14,476 53 17,768 298.3 1.69(1.18–2.43) 1.80(1.17–2.76)
DPP 1.14(0.60–1.97) 32,088 67 38,016 176.2 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
PIO vs. SU PIO 1.17(0.67–1.97) 6,819 18 8,315 216.5 1.02(0.62–1.68) 1.03(0.62–1.73)
SU 1.31(0.65–1.97) 43,281 115 54,678 210.3 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Duration of Treatment after 2 Years
PIO vs. DPP PIO 1.13(0.47–2.09) 4,214 22 5,945 370.0 1.91(1.07–3.41) 1.86(1.02–3.41)
DPP 1.03(0.43–2.00) 9,129 24 12,384 193.8 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
PIO vs. SU PIO 1.13(0.47–2.12) 1,942 <11 NR 328.0 1.65(0.81–3.38) 1.65(0.81–3.37)
SU 1.24(0.51–2.31) 15,159 46 23,058 199.5 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Initial-treatment Analyses
Overall
PIO vs. DPP PIO 3.41(1.57–4.86) 17,081 133 56,079 237.2 1.40(1.10–1.79) 1.31(1.00–1.72)
DPP 1.90(0.84–3.31) 36,450 140 81,932 170.9 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
PIO vs. SU PIO 3.32(1.46–4.80) 8,022 51 25,684 198.6 1.07(0.79–1.45) 1.11(0.81–1.52)
SU 2.12(0.91–3.81) 47,590 219 117,202 186.9 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Time Since Treatment Initiation Restricted To 2 Years
PIO vs. DPP PIO 1.97(1.57–1.97) 17,081 71 28,215 251.6 1.43(1.05–1.96) 1.38(0.96–1.99)
DPP 1.90(0.84–1.97) 36,450 91 51,710 176.0 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
PIO vs. SU PIO 1.97(1.46–1.97) 8,022 23 13,063 176.1 0.87(0.56–1.36) 0.88(0.56–1.38)
SU 1.97(0.91–1.97) 47,590 141 69,406 203.2 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Time Since Treatment Initiation after 2 Years
PIO vs. DPP PIO 2.27(1.29–3.32) 11,993 62 27,865 222.5 1.37(0.93–2.00) 1.24(0.84–1.84)
DPP 1.39(0.62–2.65) 17,644 49 30,222 162.1 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
PIO vs. SU PIO 2.21(1.27–3.29) 5,506 28 12,621 221.9 1.34(0.87–2.06) 1.43(0.92–2.23)
SU 1.71(0.77–2.93) 25,124 78 47,796 163.2 1 (reference) 1 (reference)

CI, Confidence Interval; DPP, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4; HR, Hazard Ratio; IQR, interquartile range; NR, Not Reportable given number of events <11; PIO, pioglitazone; SU, sulfonylureas

*

Follow-up started on the cohort entry date (second dispensing) and was censored at first occurrence of outcome, death, end of study (December 2014), or end of enrollment. As-treated analyses additionally censored at treatment discontinuation (no subsequent fill of initiated drug class within days-supply plus a 90-day grace period). A 180-day induction period was imposed excluding time from the beginning of follow-up. The as-treated analyses additionally added a 180-day latency period to the end of follow-up when possible prior to death or end of patient data.

Number contributing with at least 180 days of follow-up. The number initiating PIO differs for each comparison due to exclusions of prior use of drugs included in comparison only.

Incidence Rate reported per 100 000 Person-Years

§

Cox proportional hazards models

||

Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for all variables in Table 1, except for metformin and those excluded within each comparison by incident user design, using propensity-score weighting (standardized to PIO population)