Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 8;21(3):1142. doi: 10.3390/ijms21031142

Table 2.

“Confusion matrix” analysis of lymphoblast respiratory function and mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm).

Method Clinical Group Actual Count Test Class % Error Statistics
ME/CFS Control
Respiratory function + ΔΨm
Linear discriminant analysis ME/CFS 49 46 3 6.1 χ2 27.9
Control 20 6 14 30.0 p 1.3 × 10−7
TOTAL 69 52 17 13.0 Fisher p = 1.2 × 10−7
Logistic regression ME/CFS 49 46 3 6.1 χ2 24.4
Control 20 7 13 35.0 p 7.7 × 10−7
TOTAL 69 54 15 14.5 Fisher p = 7.7 × 10−7
Respiratory function only
Linear discriminant analysis ME/CFS 49 46 3 6.1 χ2 12.4
Control 20 11 9 55.0 p 4.4 × 10−4
TOTAL 69 57 12 20.2 Fisher p = 3.8 × 10−4
Logistic regression ME/CFS 49 46 3 6.1 χ2 15.1
Control 20 10 10 50.0 p 1.0 × 10−4
TOTAL 69 53 16 18.8 Fisher p = 9.3 × 10−5