Table 1.
Bivariate correlations and descriptive statistics.
| 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. | 8. | 9. | 10. | 11. | 12. | 13. | 14. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Intrinsic Religiousness T1 | - | |||||||||||||
| 2. Intrinsic Religiousness T2 | 0.86 ** | - | ||||||||||||
| 3. Intrinsic Religiousness T3 | 0.85 ** | 0.86 ** | - | |||||||||||
| 4. Entitativity T1 | −0.05 | 0.02 | −0.02 | - | ||||||||||
| 5. Entitativity T2 | −0.04 | −0.02 | −0.02 | 0.28 ** | - | |||||||||
| 6. Entitativity T3 | −0.06 | −0.07 | −0.04 | 0.19 ** | 0.52 ** | - | ||||||||
| 7. Pos. Affect T1 | 0.30 ** | 0.29 ** | 0.32 ** | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.13 * | - | |||||||
| 8. Pos. Affect T2 | 0.27 ** | 0.24 ** | 0.29 ** | 0.06 | 0.22 ** | 0.17 * | 0.57 ** | - | ||||||
| 9. Pos. Affect T3 | 0.28 ** | 0.23 ** | 0.26 ** | 0.03 | 0.21 ** | 0.25 ** | 0.58 ** | 0.68 ** | - | |||||
| 10. Generosity T1 | 0.30 ** | 0.24 ** | 0.27 ** | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.29 ** | 0.31 ** | 0.22 ** | - | ||||
| 11. Generosity T2 | 0.27 ** | 0.25 ** | 0.24 ** | −0.09 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.21 ** | 0.30 ** | 0.11 | 0.59 ** | - | |||
| 12. Generosity T3 | 0.32 ** | 0.30 ** | 0.34 ** | −0.02 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.21 ** | 0.30 ** | 0.29 ** | 0.67 ** | 0.50 ** | - | ||
| 13. Funds raised | 0.15 ** | 0.21 ** | 0.19 ** | −0.01 | −0.08 | −0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.15 * | 0.08 | - | |
| 14. Socioeconomic Status | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.100 | −0.04 | −0.05 | −0.11 | 0.14 ** | −0.02 | 0.03 | −0.00 | −0.10 | −0.08 | 0.13 | - |
| M | 4.07 | 3.98 | 4.03 | 3.27 | 3.82 | 4.08 | 3.61 | 3.50 | 3.52 | 5.00 | 4.90 | 4.93 | 1.44 | 3.88 |
| SD | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.02 | 1.64 | 1.69 | 1.66 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.20 | 0.89 |
Note: T1 = Pre-training. T2 = Mid-training. T3 = Post-race. Intrinsic religiousness and positive affect were scaled from 1 to 5, entitativity, generosity, and wealth were scaled from 1 to 6, and funds raised was scaled from 0 to 4. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.