Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):e1010–e1018. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002052

TABLE 4.

Pearson correlation analyses for cochlear implant (CI) candidates between best-aided preoperative sentence recognition scores and demographic and audiologic measures

Sentence Recognition
AzBio in Quiet (% Key Words Correct) (N = 31) AzBio in Babble (% Key Words Correct) (N = 16) CUNY (% Words Correct) (N = 31)
r Value (95% Confidence Interval) r Value (95% Confidence Interval) r value (95% Confidence Interval)
Demographic/Audiologic Measures
 Age (years) 0.14 (−0.22 to 0.46) 0.36 (−0.71 to 0.16) −0.13 (−0.46 to 0.23)
 Better ear pure-tone average (dB HL) −0.44* (−0.68 to −0.10) 0.18 (−0.61 to 0.34) −0.42* (−0.67 to −0.08)
 MMSE (raw score) 0.17 (−0.19 to 0.49) 0.34 (−0.18 to 0.70) 0.35 (−0.05 to 0.62)
 Reading ability (WRAT score) 0.18 (−0.18 to 0.50) 0.01 (−0.48 to 0.49) 0.22 (−0.14 to 0.53)
 SES 0.20 (−0.16 to 0.51) 0.16 (−0.35 to 0.59) 0.21 (−0.15 to 0.52)
 Total duration hearing loss (years) −0.09 (−0.42 to 0.27) 0.19 (−0.33 to 0.61) −0.16 (−0.48 to 0.20)
 Duration hearing loss until CI (years) −0.06 (−0.40 to 0.30) 0.23 (−0.29 to 0.64) −0.10 (−0.43 to 0.26)
*

p < 0.05.

HL indicates hearing level; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; SES, Socioeconomic status; WRAT, Wide Range Achievement Test.