Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 6;17(3):1037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031037

Table 2.

Feasibility and acceptability of the SG and ranking for the SF-6D descriptive system.

Variables Interviewer Rating of Interviewee Participation (n = 126)
Problem in Performing Task (%) Effort and Concentration (%) Problem in Performing Task (%) Effort and Concentration (%)
None (47.6) Some (51.6) A Lot (0.8) Great (59.7) Some (34.7) Little (5.6) None (58.1) Some (41.1) A Lot (0.8) Great (27.4) Some (66.1) Little (6.5)
Interviewee self-evaluation Ranking SG
Challenge level of task
Easy (37.1%) 21.0 16.1 0.0 20.2 12.9 4.0 23.4 13.7 0.0 7.3 25.8 4.0
Neutral (37.9%) 13.7 23.4 0.8 24.2 12.9 0.8 20.2 16.9 0.8 10.5 25.8 1.6
Difficult (25.0%) 12.9 12.1 0.0 15.3 8.9 0.8 14.5 10.5 0.0 9.7 14.5 0.8
Tried best to answer
Yes (92.7) 45.2 46.8 0.8 56.5 31.5 4.8 55.6 36.3 0.8 25.8 61.3 5.6
No (7.3) 2.4 4.8 0.0 3.2 3.2 0.8 2.4 4.8 0.0 1.6 4.8 0.8
Number of dimensions considered in SG
None (13.7) 7.3 6.5 0.0 8.1 5.6 0.0 7.3 6.5 0.0 4.0 8.9 0.8
One (2.4) 0.8 1.6 0.0 0.8 1.6 0.0 1.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0
Two (33.9) 16.9 16.9 0.0 22.6 10.5 0.8 22.6 11.3 0.0 6.5 26.6 0.8
≥Three (50.0) 22.6 26.6 0.8 28.2 16.9 4.8 26.6 22.6 0.8 16.9 28.2 4.8
Quality of answers
Very good (33.9%) 16.1 17.7 0.0 19.4 12.1 2.4 20.2 13.7 0.0 8.1 22.6 3.2
Good (51.6%) 25.0 25.8 0.8 31.5 17.7 2.4 29.8 21.8 0.0 15.3 33.9 2.4
Average (14.5%) 6.5 8.1 0.0 8.9 4.8 0.8 8.1 5.6 0.8 4.0 9.7 0.8
Felt bored or irritated
Yes (21.0) 1.6 2.4 0.0 1.6 2.4 1.6 0.0 1.6 2.4 2.4 1.6 0.0
No (79.0) 46.0 49.2 0.8 46.0 57.3 33.1 5.6 56.5 38.7 25.0 64.5 6.5

SG: Standard gamble; SF-6D: Short form 6 dimensions.