Abstract
Objective(s):
Prevention of the globally spread zoonotic infection, brucellosis which affects an extensive range of hosts is still challenging researchers. There are no approved vaccines for the prevention of human disease and those used for animal brucellosis have adverse properties, which limit their application. We investigated the immunological and protective effects of recombinant 16 kDa outer membrane protein of Brucella abortus (Omp16) which introduced a new candidate for brucellosis subunit vaccine.
Materials and Methods:
Brucella Omp16 gene was cloned in pET-23a and expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Recombinant Omp16 (rOmp16) was purified using nickel resin and confirmed by Western blot analysis. BALB/c mice were immunized with rOmp16, afterward, specific serum antibodies and cytokine responses were evaluated. Protection of immunized mice against pathogenic B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M was evaluated by the intraperitoneal bacterial challenge.
Results:
Sequencing results of the recombinant plasmid vector along with Western blotting confirmed the cloning procedure. Recognition of rOmp16 by specific IgG from serum samples of infected cases suggests the stimulation of immune response to this protein. Significant total serum IgG along with remarkable IgG1 and IgG2a response to the protein was recorded. A significant increase in IFN-γ, and IL-4 levels were observed from splenocyte cultures of immunized mice which were stimulated with rOmp16 suggesting the development of T-lymphocyte mediated immunity against the recombinant antigen.
Conclusion:
The intraperitoneal challenge with B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M confirmed that rOmp16 is able to elicit efficient protective immune responses in the animal host.
Key Words: BALB/c mice, Brucella, Brucellosis, Outer membrane protein, Recombinant protein
Introduction
Brucella is Gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacteria which cause brucellosis in both animals and humans (1, 2). The most important Brucella pathogens for human and animals are Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis (2-4). The animal infection causes abortion and reduces fertility in livestock, which leads to significant economic losses all over the world (4, 5). Human brucellosis is known to have nonspecific manifestations such as undulant fever, osteomyelitis, and arthritis (1, 6-8).
B. melitensis Rev 1 and B. abortus S19 are live attenuated vaccine strains that are currently used in sheep and cattle, respectively. They were successful in disease eradication and control programs in some countries (3, 9). However, there are considerable troubles associated with the use of these vaccine strains. The most important problems are development of agglutinating antibodies in vaccinated animals which are indistinguishable from those elicited by natural infection (10, 11). Moreover, antibodies against Brucella LPS could cross-react with some Gram-negative bacteria (12, 13). The new brucellosis vaccines overcome to these problems and have some properties that’s great importance to veterinary medicine. One of the major aims of researches in brucellosis is the identification of Brucella antigens, eliciting immune responses, which might be useful for the development of subunit vaccines or diagnostic tests that avoid the disadvantages of currently used ones (13-15).
Outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of Brucella are considered by far as the immunogenic component of the bacterial cell wall (13, 16) and there are many reports which describe their protective effects in animal models (17-25). Omp16 is an outer membrane protein which included in all Brucella strains (26-28). In this report, we describe the full-length cloning, expression, and purification of Omp16 and assessment of immunological properties of this recombinant protein in BALB/c mouse model.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains and plasmid vectors
B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M were routinely cultured on Brucella agar and incubated in 37 °C for 72 hr. Escherichia coli DH5α and E. coli BL21 (DE3) were used as prokaryotic hosts for cloning and expression respectively and were cultured using LB broth/agar Merk- Germany.
pJET1.2 (Thermo Scientific) and pET-28a (+) (Novagen) were applied as cloning and expression plasmid vectors.
Cloning of Omp16
A primer pair was designed to amplify the whole coding region of Omp16 which were F5’-TTAGGATCCATGCGCCGTATCCAGTCGAT-3 and R5’- AACAAGCTTTTACCGTCCGGCCCCGTTG -3’ including restriction sequences of BamHI and HindIII at the 5’-end respectively (underlined). Complete ORF or Omp16 gene was amplified with PrimSTAR® HS DNA polymerase (TaKaRa) and Blunt ended amplified product was cloned in pJET1.2 plasmid vector by clonJET® PCR Cloning Kit (Thermo Scientific). Recombinant pJET1.2-Omp16 constructs were sequenced with pJET1.2 specific primers (Thermo Scientific) in an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer machine. Sequencing results were analyzed with Vector NTITM advanced 11.0 (Invitrogen). The Omp16 was then sub cloned in pET-23a (+) vector between BamHI and HindIII restriction sites (pET28-Omp16). Using T7 promoter/terminator universal primers, recombinant plasmids were confirmed by sequencing as described above.
Protein expression and purification
pET28-Omp16 was transformed to E. coli BL21(DE3). Recombinant colonies were grown in LB medium containing kanamycin (30 µg/ml) at 37 °C to reach an OD620. Subsequently, IPTG at the final concentration of 1 mM was added to the growing culture, in order to expression of recombinant Omp16 (rOmp16). Samples of three hours of induction at 37 °C were collected along with a non-induction sample as the control. Sample lysates were analyzed by 12.5% resolving polyacrylamide in mini gels (Bio-Rad) and followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 staining (29).
The cell pellet from two liters of 2-hour induced culture was collected. rOmp16 was purified according to the previously described hybrid procedure (29). Totally, the cell pellet was suspended and lysed thoroughly in buffer containing 8 M urea (Buffer B, pH 8.5, QIAGEN). Cell debris were removed by centrifugation and Ni-NTA resin (QIAGEN) was added to the clear lysate, then mixed by rotation for one hour. The resin was washed twice with buffer C (8 M urea, pH 6.3) and urea was removed by washing the resin with buffers containing decreasing urea concentrations (8, 6, 4, 2, 1, and 0 M, pH 8.5). The column was washed with native wash buffer (40 mM imidazole, pH 8.5), and 6-His-tagged rOmp16 was eluted with 350 mM imidazole. Imidazole was subsequently removed by dialysis against PBS (pH 7.5). Recombinant protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and quantified by spectrophotometer NanoDrop® 2000 (Thermo Scientific, USA). After purification of rOMP16, in order to remove LPS, EtEraser™ HP Endotoxin Removal Kit (BioEndo, China) was used according to related guideline.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed according to previously described procedures (29). Briefly, purified rOmp16 was electro-transferred from unstained 12.5% polyacrylamide gel to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane in a semidry transfer apparatus (Trans-Blot® SD, Bio-Rad, USA). The sheet was blocked by 2% bovine serum albumin dissolved in PBS (pH 7.5) for one hour at 37°C while rocking. The protein was probed by rabbit polyclonal anti-serum against Brucella outer membrane protein complex (prepared in our laboratory). HRP conjugated anti-rabbit IgG applied to the sheet as the secondary antibody. The sheet was finally developed with chemiluminescent substrate (ECL) under standard conditions and the appearance of fluorescent bands was immediately recorded on radiographic films. Purified rOmp16 were also subjected to Western blot analysis and probed by 1:3000 dilutions of 3 serum samples from brucellosis patients. These were treated with HRP-Anti-Human IgG and developed as described above.
Mouse immune response analysis
Six- to seven-week-old Female BALB/c mice were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Production Department at Pasteur Institute of Iran (Research & Production Complex, Alborz). Animal maintenance, handling, and all experiments were performed with strict accordance to institutional ethical guidelines and international protocols (30). Mice were immunized subcutaneously with rOmp16 formulated in Freund’s adjuvant in three dose with 10-day intervals. Negative control non-immunized mice group received phosphate buffered saline simultaneously. The two vaccine groups were considered which received a single intraperitoneal dose containing 104 CFU of B. abortus S19 and B. melitensis Rev1 (25).
Mice were bled from the retroocular vein at days 0, 10, 20 (prior to antigen administration), 30, 40 and 50. Serum samples were collected and stored at -80 °C. All samples were investigated for specific total serum IgG (Sigma, USA), IgG1 and IgG2a levels using rOmp16 as capture protein via indirect ELISA (ISO-2; Sigma) as described before (29). IgG1 and IgG2a were assessed at a single dilution of 1:100 in sera collected at day 30.
Ten days after last immunization dose, splenectomy was performed and spleen lymphocytes from sacrificed mice were cultured in 24 and 96 well-plates at 4 × 106 and 2.5 × 105 cells per-well, respectively, using RPMI (Gibco®, France) supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco®), Pen-Strep (Gibco®) and non-essential amino acids (Gibco®). Cultures were separately stimulated with 5 µg/ml of rOmp16 and incubated for 72 hr at 37 °C and 5% of CO2. Lymphocytic proliferation was assayed in 96-well plates by BrdU (Roche). Cell-free culture media, collected from 24-well plates were examined by specific ELISA for evaluation of IL-4 and IFN-γ levels (R&D).
Protective immunity assessment
Four weeks after the last protein booster dose, 8 mice from each group were challenged intraperitoneally with 105 CFU of B. abortus 544 and 8 mice were challenged similarly infected with B. melitensis 16M pathogenic strains. Mice were maintained under strict biosafety considerations for 14 days. Then, mice were sacrificed, their spleen were removed and homogenized, and dilutions from spleen suspensions were inoculated and spread on Brucella agar plates (duplicates for each mouse). Plates were incubated at 35 °C for 72 hr; Brucella colonies were counted subsequently.
Statistical analysis
Data from all experiments were collected in and analyzed with the software IBM® SPSS® Statistics (Version 22.0) using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and differences between groups were processed with LSD test or Games-Howell test for unequal variances upon homogeneity status.
Results
Molecular cloning, protein expression, and purification
Omp16 gene was successfully cloned in pJET1.2 and subsequently sub cloned in pET-28a (+). Alignment of recombinant pJET-Omp16 and pET23-Omp16 sequencing results with reference sequences showed complete identity and no mutation in cloned ORF.
SDS-PAGE analysis of induced culture samples of E. coli BL21(DE3) which was transformed with pET23-Omp16 compared to non-induced one and non-transformed host shows the expression of an approximately ~16kDa protein (Figure 1). The expression reaches the maximum rate 2 hr after induction and remains unchanged in next hour. Purification of the protein was fulfilled using Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen; USA) via a hybrid method of denaturation and renaturation (Figure 1). A significant high yield of the rOmp16 was achieved through this method, which was measured to 3.4 mg/1 lit of induced culture.
Figure 1.
Omp16 gene expression was analyzed in SDS-PAGE. Moreover, the efficiency of purification process of rOMP16 was showed in lane 5. Recombinant host was induced with IPTG in order to express rOMP16 during 4 hr

Columns 1, 2, 3 and 4 related to the before and two, three and four hours after the induction of expression the rOmp16 by the IPTG, respectively. Column 5 is purified rOmp16 and column 6 is protein marker (down to up respectively, 14.4, 18.4, 25, 35, 45, 66.2 and 116 KDa)
Western blot analysis
Purified recombinant rOmp16 was successfully recognized by rabbit polyclonal anti-serum and sera from three microbiologically confirmed hospitalized patients (Figure 2). This indicates that epitopes of rOmp16 are at least partially similar to the native component.
Figure 2.
The Western blot detection of purified rOmp16

Prestained protein marker contain 20, 30, 35, 45, 50, 55 and 60 KDa
Immunoglobulin G response
Levels of total serum IgG total, IgG1 and IgG2a subclasses are illustrated (Figure 3). Level of all antigen-specific IgG subclasses was high in mice immunized with rOmp16 (P<0.05) in comparison with PBS group.
Figure 3.
The immunoassay test results were showed mice which immunes by rOmp16 has significant difference with non-immune group. Moreover, there are no significant difference among third groups (except PBS group)
Lymphocyte response
Lymphocyte stimulation indices and cytokine levels produced from lymphocyte cultures showed that mice which were immunized with rOmp16 produced high levels of IFN-γ, and IL-4 in response to stimulation with the same protein (P≤0.05) (Figure 3).
Protective immunity
Mice were challenged intraperitoneally with B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M and showed the best protection as it was expected (P<0.05). Mice which were immunized by rOmp16 also showed a significant protection against both pathogenic strains (P<0.05). Protection conferred by rOmp16 was not statistically different between mice which were vaccinated with B. abortus S19 and B. melitensis Rev-1 (P≥0.05).
Colony count of splenocytes
At post-infection, mice were euthanized and spleen was removed. Figure 4 shows a chart which colony count of every groups. There should be a clear reduction in the number of colonies as CFU. If the mouse has cleared the Brucella infection (i.e. detection limit = 100 CFU/tissue), then <5 Brucella colonies will be present on the brucella agar plate.
Figure 4.

Colony count of splenocye related to each groups Colony count of Brucell spp. in different groups of Mice spleen culture on brucella agar plates
Discussion
Brucellosis is a globally spread zoonotic infection and is known to be endemic in most regions of the developing countries (31-38). The main strategy for controlling the disease is vaccination the livestock and elimination the infected animals; there are no confirmed vaccines for human (15, 33, 39-41). Brucella proteins, especially those located in the outer membrane of the bacterial cell interact with host immune system upon infection and may serve as effective candidates for subunit vaccines (16, 42-45). Although the major antigen is lipopolysaccharide of smooth Brucella, outer membrane proteins are important in host immune responses to the pathogen (14, 46). Omp16 as a major outer surface antigens of Brucella is a porin protein, which has been previously shown that its antibody was recognized in serum of brucellosis patients (47-50). These properties suggest that Omp16 can be investigated as a candidate for subunit vaccines against Brucellosis.
Omp16 was successfully produced and purified in E. coli bacteria with a significant purity and yield. In our strategy, we used pET23a (+) as expression vector which adds a minimum of amino acids to the resulting protein. Sung et al. reported the production of Omp16 in a pMAL system in which the target is inserted down-stream of the male gene which encodes maltose-binding protein (MBP) as compared with current study (19). The target protein is fused with the MBP as a solubility tag and purification system which is more different from the native one. Our method for purification the rOmp16, yielded a significant amount of soluble protein to which no additional solubility tags are attached and is more closely related to the native protein structure. Purified rOmp16 was recognized by rabbit polyclonal anti serum against Brucella outer membrane protein complex which suggest that the produced protein has antigenic properties to the native bacterial OMP. Reaction with antibodies in sera from brucellosis patients implies that specific immune responses are developed against Omp16 upon infection of the host with Brucella.
Total IgG response to the rOmp16 was significant and indicated that the protein is a potent antigen which can elicit the remarkable antibody response in immunized mice. The specific IgG1 and IgG2a levels also show that the protein is capable to inducing both subclasses with a significant difference rather than the non-immunized mice.
Pasquerich et al. in Argentina have been established that immunization with purified lipidated Omp19 in adjuvant elicits protection against B. abortus infection. They are also founded that Omp16 of B. abortus as a recombinant lipoprotein in adjuvant elicited protection against B. abortus infection, further confirming that Omp16 is an important candidate for a vaccine against Brucella. They are showed that immunization with lipidated Omp16 (L-Omp16) or L-Omp19 in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) conferred significant protection against B. abortus infection and vaccination with unlipidated Omp16 (U-Omp16) or U-Omp19 in IFA induced a higher degree of protection than the respective lipidated versions. Overall the results of these researchers indicate that U-Omp16 or U-Omp19 would be a useful candidate for a subunit vaccine against human and animal brucellosis (25).
Lymphocyte proliferation responses and high level of IFN-γ production in splenocyte cultures from mice which were immunized with rOmp16 clearly show the development of the Th-1 type of immune responses against rOmp16. Although it is less than attenuated vaccine strains, immunization with rOmp16 elicited significant protection in BALB/c mice against both B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M pathogenic strais which is in full consistency with cytokine responses. The low levels of antibodies or cytokines in mice which received attenuated vaccines may be attributable to the lower amount of Omp16 in the bacterial cell as compared to pure protein dose; this may result in the development of the smaller number of specific T-lymphocyte clones which recognize Omp16 epitopes.
Conclusion
Put together, rOmp16 is capable of inducing both antibody and cytokine responses which indicate a Th-1 type response and suggest Omp16 as an outstanding candidate for designing subunit vaccines against brucellosis.
Acknowledgment
The results described in this paper were part of student thesis of Islamic Azad University- Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.
References
- 1.Hasanjani-Roushan MR, Ebrahimpour S. Human brucellosis: an overview. Caspian J Intern Med. 2015;6:46–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lynch JS. Brucellosis: A zoonotic infection and worldwide public health concern. JAAPA. 2014;27:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smits HL. Brucellosis in pastoral and confined livestock: prevention and vaccination. Rev Sci Tech. 2013;32:219–228. doi: 10.20506/rst.32.1.2200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Poester FP, Samartino LE, Santos RL. Pathogenesis and pathobiology of brucellosis in livestock. Rev Sci Tech. 2013;32:105–115. doi: 10.20506/rst.32.1.2193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Singh BB, Dhand NK, Gill JP. Economic losses occurring due to brucellosis in Indian livestock populations. Prev Vet Med . 2015;119:211–215. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Doganay M. Human brucellosis: Importance of brucellosis. Recent patents on anti-infective drug discovery. 2013;8:2–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ramin B, MacPherson P. Human brucellosis: Brucellose beim Menschen. PARAXIS. 2011;100:305–307. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a000452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Taleski V. An overview of introducing various laboratory tests for diagnosis of human brucellosis in the republic of Macedonia. MJMS. 2010;3:239–245. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Olsen SC. Recent developments in livestock and wildlife brucellosis vaccination. Rev Sci Tech. 2013;32:207–217. doi: 10.20506/rst.32.1.2201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Blasco JM, Diaz R. Brucella melitensis Rev-1 vaccine as a cause of human brucellosis. Lancet. 1993;342 doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91571-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Squarcione S, Maggi P, Lo Caputo S, De Gennaro M, Carbonara S. A case of human brucellosis caused by accidental injection of animal vaccine. G Ital Med Lav. 1990;12:25–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nielsen K, Yu WL. Serological diagnosis of brucellosis. Prilozi. 2010;31:65–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schurig GG, Sriranganathan N, Corbel MJ. Brucellosis vaccines: past, present and future. Vet Microbiol. 2002;90:479–496. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00255-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shumilov KV, Sklyarov O, Klimanov A. Designing vaccines against cattle brucellosis. Vaccine. 2010;28:31–34. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ficht TA, Kahl-McDonagh MM, Arenas-Gamboa AM, Rice-Ficht AC. Brucellosis: the case for live, attenuated vaccines. Vaccine. 2009;27:40–43. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abadi AH, Mahdavi M, Khaledi A, Esmaeili A, Esmaeili D, Sahebkar A. Study of serum bactericidal and splenic activity of Total-OMP-CagA combination from Brucella abortus and Helicobacter pylori in BALB/c mouse model. Microb Pathog. 2018;121:100–105. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.04.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zheng WY, Wang Y, Zhang ZC, Yan F. Immunological characteristics of outer membrane protein omp31 of goat Brucella and its monoclonal antibody. GMR. 2015;14:11965–11974. doi: 10.4238/2015.October.5.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Clausse M, Diaz AG, Ibanez AE, Cassataro J, Giambartolomei GH, Estein SM. Evaluation of the efficacy of outer membrane protein 31 vaccine formulations for protection against Brucella canis in BALB/c mice. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21:1689–1694. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00527-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sung KY, Jung M, Shin MK, Park HE, Lee JJ, Kim S, Yoo HS. Induction of immune responses by two recombinant proteins of Brucella abortus, outer membrane proteins 2b porin and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase, in mouse model. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;24:854–861. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1312.12063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ibanez AE, Smaldini P, Coria LM, Delpino MV, Pacifico LG, Oliveira SC, et al. Unlipidated outer membrane protein Omp16 (U-Omp16) from Brucella spp as nasal adjuvant induces a Th1 immune response and modulates the Th2 allergic response to cow’s milk proteins. PLoS One. 2013;8:1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gomez G, Pei J, Mwangi W, Adams LG, Rice-Ficht A, Ficht TA. Immunogenic and invasive properties of Brucella melitensis 16M outer membrane protein vaccine candidates identified via a reverse vaccinology approach. PLoS One. 2013;8:59751–59759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goel D, Bhatnagar R. Intradermal immunization with outer membrane protein 25 protects BALB/c mice from virulent B abortus 544. Mol Immunol. 2012;51:159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.02.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lim JJ, Kim DH, Lee JJ, Kim DG, Min W, Lee HJ, et al. Evaluation of recombinant 28 kDa outer membrane protein of Brucella abortus for the clinical diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Korea. J Vet Med Sci. 2012;74:687–691. doi: 10.1292/jvms.11-0512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mythili T, Rajendra L, Thiagarajan D, Srinivasan VA. Immunogenecity of a Brucella abortus S19 glyco-conjugate vaccine consisting of lipo-polysaccharide and outer membrane protein in cattle calves. Curr. Trends Biotechnol. Pharm. 2010;4:510–518. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pasquevich KA, Estein SM, Garcia Samartino C, Zwerdling A, Coria LM, Barrionuevo P, Fossati CA, Giambartolomei GH, Cassataro J. Immunization with recombinant Brucella species outer membrane protein Omp16 or Omp19 in adjuvant induces specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as systemic and oral protection against Brucella abortus infection. Infect Immun. 2009;77:436–445. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01151-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Paquet JY, Vinals C, Wouters J, Letesson JJ, Depiereux E. Topology prediction of Brucella abortus Omp16 and Omp16 porins after critical assessment of transmembrane beta strands prediction by several secondary structure prediction methods. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2000;17:747–757. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2000.10506564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mobasheri H, Ficht TA, Marquis H, Lea EJ, Lakey JH. Brucella Omp16 and Omp16 porins: single channel measurements and topology prediction. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;155:23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cloeckaert A, Verger JM, Grayon M, Vizcaino N. Molecular and immunological characterization of the major outer membrane proteins of Brucella. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;145:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aghababa H, Mohabati Mobarez A, Khoramabadi N, Behmanesh M, Mahdavi M, Tebianian M, et al. A comparative approach to strategies for cloning, expression, and purification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis mycolyl transferase 85B and evaluation of immune responses in BALB/c mice. Mol. Biotechnol. 2014;56:487–497. doi: 10.1007/s12033-013-9696-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8 edn. Washington DC: National Academies Press ; 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Leylabadlo HE, Bialvaei AZ, Kafil HS. Brucellosis in Iran: Why not eradicated? Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:1129–1167. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mangalgi SS, Sajjan AG, Mohite ST, Kakade SV. Serological, clinical, and epidemiological profile of human brucellosis in rural india. Indian J Community Med. 2015;40:163–167. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.158847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Musallam , II , Abo-Shehada MN, Hegazy YM, Holt HR, Guitian FJ. Systematic review of brucellosis in the Middle East: disease frequency in ruminants and humans and risk factors for human infection. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144:671–685. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815002575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ducrotoy M, Bertu WJ, Matope G, Cadmus S, Conde-Alvarez R, Gusi AM, et al. Brucellosis in Sub-Saharan Africa: Current challenges for management, diagnosis and control. Acta Trop. 2017;165:179–193. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hotez PJ, Savioli L, Fenwick A. Neglected tropical diseases of the Middle East and North Africa: review of their prevalence, distribution, and opportunities for control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:1–8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shalmali , Panda AK, Chahota R. Sero-prevalence of brucellosis in occupationally exposed human beings of Himachal Pradesh (India) J Commun Dis. 2012;44:91–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Haque N, Bari MS, Hossain MA, Muhammad N, Ahmed S, Rahman A, et al. An overview of Brucellosis. Mymensingh Med J. 2011;20:742–747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nicoletti P. Brucellosis: past, present and future. Prilozi. 2010;31:21–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dean AS, Crump L, Greter H, Schelling E, Zinsstag J. Global burden of human brucellosis: a systematic review of disease frequency. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Blasco JM, Molina-Flores B. Control and eradication of Brucella melitensis infection in sheep and goats. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2011;27:95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Olsen SC, Stoffregen WS. Essential role of vaccines in brucellosis control and eradication programs for livestock. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2005;4:915–928. doi: 10.1586/14760584.4.6.915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ko KY, Kim JW, Her M, Kang SI, Jung SC, Cho DH, et al. Immunogenic proteins of Brucella abortus to minimize cross reactions in brucellosis diagnosis. Vet Microbiol. 2012;156:374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Siadat SD, Aghasadeghi MR, Karami S, Sadat SM, Moshiri A. Biological and immunological characteristics of Brucella abortus S99 major outer membrane proteins. Jundishapur J.Microbiol. 2011;4:29–36. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Connolly JP, Comerci D, Alefantis TG, Walz A, Quan M, Chafin R, et al. Proteomic analysis of Brucella abortus cell envelope and identification of immunogenic candidate proteins for vaccine development. Proteomics. 2006;6:3767–3780. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cloeckaert A, Kerkhofs P, Limet JN. Antibody response to Brucella outer membrane proteins in bovine brucellosis: immunoblot analysis and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:3168–3174. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3168-3174.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gonzalez D, Grillo MJ, De Miguel MJ, Ali T, Arce-Gorvel V, Delrue RM, et al. Brucellosis vaccines: assessment of Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide rough mutants defective in core and O-polysaccharide synthesis and export. PLoS One. 2008;3:1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jain S, Kumar S, Dohre S, Afley P, Sengupta N, Alam SI. Identification of a protective protein from stationary-phase exoproteome of Brucella abortus. PATHOG DIS. 2014;70:75–83. doi: 10.1111/2049-632X.12079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tibor A, Wansard V, Bielartz V, Delrue RM, Danese I, Michel P, et al. Effect of omp10 or omp19 deletion on Brucella abortus outer membrane properties and virulence in mice. Infect Immun. 2002;70:5540–5546. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5540-5546.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cloeckaert A, Vizcaino N, Paquet JY, Bowden RA, Elzer PH. Major outer membrane proteins of Brucella spp: past, present and future. Vet Microbiol. 2002;90:229–247. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00211-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tibor A, Decelle B, Letesson JJ. Outer membrane proteins Omp10, Omp16, and Omp19 of Brucella spp are lipoproteins. Infect Immun. 1999;67:4960–4962. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.9.4960-4962.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

