Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov 8;54:89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.022

Table 3:

Summary of findings for adverse magnet-resonance imaging related problems in iMRI suites.

Study (author and year) Description Magnetic Field Strength in Tesla (T) Incidence of outcome N (included cases) Data quality GRADING (reason) Critique/comments
Choudhri 2014 Retrospective study that assessed primarily surgical difficulties for pediatric neurosurgical patients undergoing iMRI.
(3 T)
No adverse MRI-related event 168 VERY LOW (observational, no control group) Authors collected MRI-associated data including amount of intravenous contrast administered and “any MRI-imaging related complication”.
Cox 2011 Retrospective study that described clinical challenges and anesthesia outcomes in 98 pediatric patients undergoing 105 iMRI procedures over 10 years. These patients were transferred to a pediatric hospital close-by for postoperative care.
(1.5 T)
No adverse MRI-related event 105 VERY LOW (observational, no control group) Authors stated in the discussion that there was “no significant morbidity attributable to […] the iMR environment”.
Jankovski 2008 Description of development of the neurosurgical iMRI suite and case series describing the first intracranial procedures in the iMRI suite.
(3 T)
No ferromagnetic accidents.
2 burns (1 intergluteal and 1 chest)
21 VERY LOW (observational, no control group) Small case series with frank discussion of various problems encountered (see below for technical problems).
Panigrahi 2008 Case series about anesthetic challenges and operative advantages of iMRI procedures.
(1.5 T)
No ferromagnetic accident 112 VERY LOW (observational, no control group) Published in abstract form only.
Raheja 2015 Retrospective analysis of predominantly surgical outcomes of the first consecutive procedures in the iMRI suite. Cases were analyzed and compared in 3 chronologic subgroups.
(1.5 T)
No adverse MRI-related event 300 LOW (observational, no adjustment for confounders) Analysis of 3 chronologic subgroups showed “learning curve” for process flow.
Rao 2012 Case series over 2 years about anesthesia considerations for intracranial iMRI procedures.
(field strength not specified)
No adverse MRI-related event 103 VERY LOW (observational, no control group) Published in abstract form only. Reported “no significant adverse events related to the iMRI environment”.
Schmitz 2003 Case series about anesthesia for initial neurosurgical iMRI cases at the author’s institution.
(1.5 T)
No adverse MRI-related event 80 VERY LOW (observational, no control group) Authors reported no ferromagnetic accidents or “any untoward events resulting from the high magnetic field”.

Abbreviations: iMRI: intraoperative magnet-resonance imaging.