Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Pathol. 2019 Aug 16;93:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.008

Table 2.

Treatment interventions of MCL study population with BIM expression and ORR

Treatment Interventions Total (%) Low BIM (<80%) High BIM (≥80%) Complete response (CR) Partial response (PR) Stable disease (SD) Progressive disease (PD)
68 (100%) 30 (44.1%) 38 (55.9%) - - - -
RCHOP-based therapy 38 (55.9%) 13 (34.2%) 25 (65.8%) 25 (65.8%) 5 (13.2%) 1 (2.6%) 7 (18.4%)
CHOP-based therapy 10 (14.7%) 7 (70%) 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (70%)
Rituximab alone + combination 5 (7.4%) 1 (20%) 4 (80%) 2 (40%) 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 2 (40%)
DICE therapy 1 (1.5%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%)
Chlorambucil alone + combination 4 (5.9%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (100%)
Cyclophosphamide + radiation therapy 1(1.5%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%)
Radiation therapy only (local) 3 (4.4%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%) 2 (66.7%) 0 (0%) 1 (33.3%) 0 (0%)
Surgery onlya 1 (1.5%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%)
Treatment unspecifiedb 1 (1.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
No intervention 3 (4.4%) 3 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%)
Status unknownc 1 (1.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%)
a

Astrectomy and splenectomy.

b

Patient was treated, but specific therapy was not documented.

c

No information available on treatment.