Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD000402. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000402.pub4

AinMelk 1996.

Methods Randomisation: random number table 
 Open‐label single‐centre, parallel group trial 
 Number of women randomised: 59 
 Number of women analysed: 53 
 Number of withdrawals: 6 (2 in group 1 owing to mastalgia, nausea, and bleeding and 2 from each group owing to bleeding) 
 Power calculation and ITT analysis: not described 
 Sources of funding: Upjohn (Canada), Wyeth‐Ayerst (Canada) and Ogen provided medication for the study
Participants Country: Canada 
 Inclusion criteria: healthy postmenopausal at least 1‐year post natural menopause, with intact uterus, vasomotor symptoms and normal endometrial histology 
 Exclusion criteria: previous use of HT
Interventions Continuous 
 (1) 0.625 mg CEE + 2.5 mg MPA 
 (2) 0.625 mg EIS + 2.5 mg MPA 
 Duration: 2 years (104 weeks)
Outcomes Irregular bleeding, endometrial histology, amenorrhoea
Power calculation described No
Analysis by Intention to Treat Not mentioned and results are based on data from the 53 women who completed the study (90% of those randomised)
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open label
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Reasons for withdrawal described
Other bias Low risk 2 parallel groups, balanced at baseline