Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 10;24(4):359–374. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000364

Table 1. Exploration of the dimensionality of the attitude-toward-the-two-candidates items.

Model G2 npar rD1-D2 relD1 relD2 relD3
Notes. G2 stands for the model fit statistic (its deviance), which is a log-likelihood statistic multiplied by −2 (see Adams, Wilson, & Wang, 1997). Differences in deviances are generally assumed to have a χ2-distribution with the difference in the number of parameters (npar) as degrees of freedom. Thus, we can statistically compare model fits of, for example, the less restricted two-dimensional (2D) model with the simpler one-dimensional (1D) model. Note that superior fit shows in smaller deviances. rD1-D2 = correlation between Dimension 1 and Dimension 2; rel = reliability estimates for Dimensions 1, 2, or 3. The correlations are estimates that have been disattenuated for measurement error (for technical details, see Adams et al., 1998).
1D: pro-R-anti-M 90,311.86 45 .92
2D: pro-R & pro-M 83,032.13 47 −.44 .91 .88
3D: 2 D & Feeling 87,555.12 53 −.31 .87 .79 .64