Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0229262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229262

Table 3. Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of the KRAS- and BRAF- mutant TSAs.

BRAF mutant TSA KRAS mutant TSA p value
No. of cases 24 11
Sex (male/female) 16/8 9/2 0.45
Age (y, mean ± SD) 65.9 ± 8.7 63.1 ± 15.9 0.61
Tumor location, n (bowel subsite)
 Proximal (C/A/T) 9 (1/7/1) 1 (0/0/1) 0.12
 Distal (D/S/R) 15 (2/9/4) 10 (0/4/6)
Tumor size (mm, mean ± SD) 11.9 ± 4.5 12.1 ± 5.9 0.92
Morphology, n (%)
 0-Ip 10 (42) 3 (27) 0.26
 0-Is 12 (50) 5 (46)
 0-IIa 2 (8) 3 (27)
Gene mutation/epigenetic alteration, n (%)
RNF43 mutation 13 (54) 0 (0) < 0.01
APC mutation 4 (17) 3 (27) 0.65
 WNT signaling associated genes 17 (71) 6 (55) 0.35
 CIMP 12 (50) 3 (27) 0.28
 CIMP-high 9 (38) 0 (0) 0.03
SMOC1 methylation 9 (38) 9 (82) 0.03

TSA, traditional serrated adenoma; C, cecum; A, ascending colon; T, transverse colon; D, descending colon; S, sigmoid colon; R, rectum; CIMP, CpG island methylator phenotype