Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 3;8(1):e000904. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000904

Table 2.

Logistic regression model comparing the prevalence of complications of diabetes in individuals selected for referral compared with the total cohort (reference category)

OR 95 % CI P value
eGFR EPI-CKD (cut-off 60)
 Model 1 No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.742 1.217 to 2.495 0.002
 Model 2 (adj gender) No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.783 1.243 to 2.556 0.002
 Model 3 (adj gender, BMI) No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.777 1.235 to 2.555 0.002
Cardiovascular event
 Model 1 No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.806 1.279 to 2.551 0.001
 Model 2 (adj gender) No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.729 1.218 to 2.453 0.002
 Model 3 (adj gender, BMI) No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.856 1.303 to 2.643 0.001
Microalbuminuria
 Model 1 No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.608 1.071 to 2.416 0.021
 Model 2 (adj gender) No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.588 1.056 to 2.390 0.026
 Model 3 (adj gender, BMI) No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.494 0.988 to 2.259 0.057
Diabetic retinopathy
 Model 1 No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.710 1.040 to 2.811 0.033
 Model 2 (adj gender) No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.725 1.049 to 2.837 0.032
 Model 3 (adj gender,BMI) No referral 1 - -
To referral 1.601 0.972 to 2.661 0.065

Model 1: crude model; Model 2: adjusted for gender; Model 3: adjusted for gender and BMI.

adj, adjusted; BMI, body mass index; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.