Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;21(3):325–331. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0508

Table 1. Qualitative Imaging Findings of cBCC and cSCC.

Qualitative Imaging Findings cBCC (n = 14) cSCC (n = 15) P
Location of nose 10 (71) 2 (13) 0.046*
Superficial ulcer formation 3 (21) 10 (67) 0.014*
Protrusion into subcutaneous tissue 3 (21) 9 (60) 0.035*
Ill-demarcated deep tumor margin 1 (7) 9 (60) 0.004
Peritumoral fat stranding 1 (7) 14 (93) < 0.001
Intratumoral heterogeneous signal intensity 4 (29) 9 (60) 0.089
Intratumoral T2-hyperintense foci 8 (57) 2 (13) 0.017*

Data are expressed as numbers of patients, and numbers in parentheses are frequencies expressed as percentages. *Significant differences in frequencies were observed between cBCC and cSCC (p < 0.05), Significant differences in frequencies were observed between cBCC and cSCC (p < 0.01). cBCC = cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, cSCC = cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma