TABLE 5.
Effect of “catch trials” on timing error.
| Coeff | P-value | |
| Intercept | 0.16 | 0.989 |
| TD0 | –7.50 | 0.631 |
| TD2 | 0.20 | 0.990 |
| G1 | 0.97 | 0.956 |
| G2 | –10.76 | 0.466 |
| G3 | 6.54 | 0.668 |
| G4 | –3.27 | 0.838 |
| Visibility (V) | 16.22 | 0.054 |
| Session order (O) | 11.44 | 0.102 |
| TD0 × G1 | 0.42 | 0.984 |
| TD2 × G1 | –2.02 | 0.923 |
| TD0 × G2 | 26.06 | 0.206 |
| TD2 × G2 | –5.52 | 0.797 |
| TD0 × G3 | –4.97 | 0.810 |
| TD2 × G3 | 5.72 | 0.787 |
| TD0 × G4 | –12.46 | 0.545 |
| TD2 × G4 | 6.41 | 0.759 |
All coefficients in milliseconds of the LMM for the fixed factors in the model used to fit the timing error and the relative P-value values are shown (gravity condition G0, traveled distance TD1, visibility: occluded, and session order: occluded in the first block are the baseline).