Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Dec 19;111:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.12.009

Table 5.

Services offered by RCCs and their perceived importance rated by RCC staff

% offered (30 centers)a
perceived importanceb (55 staff)
Service % (n) mean (SD)
Support Group Meetings
  “All Recovery” meetings 60.0 (18) 6.3 (1.3)
  Mutual-help groups by known organizations (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous) 96.7 (29) 6.6 (0.7)
  Other peer-facilitated recovery support groups (e.g., relapse prevention groups) 76.7 (23) 6.6 (0.7)
  Mental health support (e.g., dual diagnosis support groups) 36.7 (11) 6.1 (1.0)
Recovery coaching (and/or case management) 76.7 (23) 6.2 (1.4)
Opioid and/or Harm Reduction Services
  Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) support (e.g., Pathway Guide, MARS group) 43.3 (13) 5.9 (1.6)
  NARCAN training and/or distribution 56.7 (17) 6.3 (1.2)
Provision of Access to Technology/Internet (e.g., use of center computers, printers, fax) 46.7 (14) 5.6 (1.4)
Assistance with Basic Needs and Social Services
  Basic needs assistance (e.g., access to food, clothing, transportation) 43.3 (13) 5.8 (1.2)
  Childcare services 10.0 (3) 4.8 (1.6)
  Education assistance 63.3 (19) 5.6 (1.3)
  Employment assistance (e.g., job or computer skills, resume writing, CORI support) 83.3 (25) 5.9 (1.2)
  Family support services (e.g., family/parent education or support groups) 86.7 (26) 6.1 (1.1)
  Financial services 23.3 (7) 5.1 (1.6)
  Health insurance education 36.7 (11) 5.2 (1.4)
  Housing assistance 70.0 (21) 5.9 (1.3)
  Legal assistance 16.7 (5) 5.0 (1.8)
Assistance with Health Behaviors
  Health, exercise, and nutrition programs (e.g., yoga, meditation, fitness classes) 83.3 (25) 5.7 (1.3)
  Smoking cessation support 53.3 (16) 5.0 (1.7)
Facilitation of Substance-free Recreational Activities
  Recreational/social activities (e.g., substance free social events) 100.0 (30) 6.3 (1.0)
  Expressive arts (e.g., arts/craft groups, music, poetry) 53.3 (16) 5.4 (1.3)

Note.

a

as reported by directors, where 2 directors managed 2 centers each

b

importance was rated on a 1 (not important at all) to 7 (extremely important) scale, where staff from 21 centers provided ratings, with 1 to 9 staff members completing surveys per RCC; n=4 staff members did not complete this part of the survey, others indicated “not applicable” instead of rating the importance of a particular service, resulting in importance ratings from n=38 staff members for “child care services” to n=55 staff members for “mutual-help groups” and “recreational activities”, respectively.