Table 1.
Growth, physiological and biochemical responses of IR-64 plants subjected to different treatments (E+/E−: Presence/absence of Fusarium sp.; S+/S−: Presence/absence of Salinity stress) (a50 day old plants; b10 day old seedlings). One-way ANOVA was done separately for E−S- and E+S− and for E−S+ and E+S+. Results are the mean of three replication ± SEm. Asteriks indicate significant difference between means within each of the above pairs of comparison at P < 0.05.
Treatments/Parameters | E−S− | E+S− | E−S+ | E+S+ |
---|---|---|---|---|
Growth parameters | ||||
Tiller number/planta | 6.83 ± 0.490 | 11.17 ± 1.705 | 3.5 ± 0.235 | 10.5 ± 0.848* |
Total biomass (g/plant)a | 19.7 ± 0.567 | 25.5 ± 1.479* | 11.6 ± 0.139 | 15.6 ± 0.597* |
Physiological parameters | ||||
Total chlorophyll content (mg g−1 fw)a | 0.05 ± 0.007 | 0.11 ± 0.007* | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.04 ± 0.007* |
Assimilation rate (μ mol m−2 s−1)a | 12.97 ± 0.808 | 15.67 ± 0.533 | 8.80 ± 1.031 | 13.97 ± 0.998* |
Stomatal conductance (m mol m−2 s−1)a | 0.27 ± 0.046 | 0.25 ± 0.046 | 0.11 ± 0.026 | 0.16 ± 0.031 |
Transpiration rate (mol m−2 s−1)a | 3.84 ± 0.410 | 3.15v0.010 | 2.11 ± 0.332 | 2.69 ± 0.363 |
Biochemical parameters | ||||
SOD activityb | 50.7 ± 1.142 | 46.57 ± 7.730 | 43.88 ± 5.999 | 25.69 ± 7.627 |
MDA content (µ mol g−1)b | 7.49 ± 0.049 | 9.28 ± 0.049* | 11.07 ± 0.049 | 12.11 ± 0.049* |
Proline content (µ mol g−1)b | 0.17 ± 0.024 | 0.07 ± 0.002* | 0.60 ± 0.000 | 0.31 ± 0.000* |