TABLE 2.
EEG spectral power | CFA vs. Rest | CFA vs. CRM | CRM vs. Rest | |
Theta (F6) | t | 11.217 | 12.028 | −0.811 |
df | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
p (FDR) | 1.53E-07 | 2.83E-07 | ns (0.43) | |
Theta (F7) | t | 10.135 | 8.120 | 2.015 |
df | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
p (FDR) | 3.72E-07 | 9.68E-06 | ns (0.08) | |
Theta (Pz) | t | 11.642 | 5.581 | 6.061 |
df | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
p (FDR) | 1.35E-07 | 2.40E-04 | 8.50E-05 | |
Alpha (FCz) | t | −22.480 | −3.083 | −20.311 |
df | 4.382 | 6.461 | 5.092 | |
p (FDR) | 1.08E-05 | 0.029 | 9.06E-06 | |
Alpha (P7) | t | −13.290 | 0.864 | −14.154 |
df | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
p (FDR) | 6.73E-08 | ns (0.40) | 2.45E-08 | |
Alpha (P8) | t | −12.851 | 1.205 | −14.056 |
df | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
p (FDR) | 6.73E-08 | ns (0.30) | 2.45E-08 |
Shown are the results of a one-way ANOVA with contrasts between the three conditions rest, content-related meditation (CRM) and content-free awareness (CFA). p (FDR) = False discovery rate corrected p-value, ns = non-significant.