Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;14:10. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00010

Table 2.

Averaged %FIT for ΔHbO and ΔHbR over all channels using KRLS with the Gaussian kernel after training and testing.

Sub. %FIT
q = 1 (0.1 s) q = 5 (0.54 s) q = 10 (1.08 s) q = 15 (1.63 s) q = 20 (2.17 s)
ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR
1 94.4
± 0.8
93.6
± 1.2
92.7
± 1.6
91.5
± 1.8
90.4
± 2.7
89.0
± 2.8
88.1
± 3.7
86.6
± 3.5
85.9
± 4.6
84.4
± 4.2
2 94.6
± 1.0
92.2
± 4.1
92.0
± 2.2
89.4
± 4.2
88.7
± 4.1
85.5
± 4.6
85.5
± 5.9
81.9
± 5.6
82.7
± 7.5
78.8
± 6.7
3 94.3
± 0.7
91.2
± 4.0
91.9
± 1.7
88.4
± 3.8
88.5
± 3.1
84.9
± 4.1
85.3
± 4.5
81.7
± 4.6
82.4
± 5.7
78.9
± 5.3
4 94.7
± 1.0
92.8
± 1.8
92.9
± 1.3
90.9
± 2.2
90.4
± 2.7
88.3
± 3.0
87.8
± 4.1
85.9
± 3.8
85.4
± 5.4
83.6
± 4.5
5 94.4
± 2.1
92.9
± 3.2
92.3
± 2.1
90.5
± 3.1
89.5
± 2.6
86.9
± 3.3
86.7
± 3.6
83.6
± 4.0
84.3
± 4.6
80.6
± 4.6
6 94.8
± 0.9
93.1
± 2.1
93.3
± 1.6
91.1
± 2.6
91.2
± 2.6
88.5
± 3.3
88.9
± 3.8
85.9
± 4.1
86.6
± 5.0
83.6
± 4.9
7 95.1
± 0.9
94.9
± 0.8
93.2
± 1.4
93.1
± 1.2
90.7
± 2.5
90.8
± 2.0
88.3
± 4.0
88.6
± 2.7
86.1
± 4.6
86.5
± 3.5
8 94.6
± 0.9
92.2
± 2.4
92.2
± 1.6
89.9
± 2.8
89.5
± 2.5
87.1
± 3.6
87.1
± 3.4
84.0
± 5.4
84.9
± 4.2
82.1
± 5.0
9 94.3
± 0.6
93.9
± 0.5
92.4
± 1.4
92.0
± 1.1
89.8
± 2.4
89.1
± 2.2
87.3
± 3.3
86.3
± 3.4
85.0
± 4.2
83.6
± 4.5
10 95.4
± 1.0
94.4
± 1.4
93.7
± 1.4
91.8
± 1.4
91.5
± 2.4
88.7
± 2.2
89.3
± 3.4
85.8
± 3.5
87.5
± 4.3
83.3
± 4.7
11 94.4
± 1.1
93.6
± 1.1
92.8
± 1.6
91.7
± 1.3
90.7
± 2.4
89.1
± 2.1
88.5
± 3.4
86.5
± 3.1
86.6
± 4.2
84.1
± 4.1
Mean
± SD
94.6
± 1.0
93.2
± 2.1
92.7
± 1.6
90.9
± 2.3
90.1
± 2.7
88.0
± 3.0
87.5
± 3.9
85.2
± 4.0
85.2
± 4.9
82.7
± 4.7